|
[Sponsors] |
Probe value different than contour!!! CFD-Post bug? |
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Search this Thread | Display Modes |
January 27, 2017, 00:46 |
Probe value different than contour!!! CFD-Post bug?
|
#1 |
Member
Ftab
Join Date: Sep 2011
Posts: 87
Rep Power: 15 |
Hi all,
I am modeling a case with fluid-porous interface, where the velocity should be around 1e-8. When I plot the velocity contour on the interface, colors pattern make sense but not the legend and color bar (shows to be 0.01). When I put the probe it shows 1.2 e-8, which to me is the correct value. Any one knows why? On the other hand, on some No slip walls the contour and legend show zero velocity and probe has values of 1e-5. The solution has been well converged with no problem and mesh is well refined. |
|
January 27, 2017, 16:47 |
|
#2 |
Super Moderator
Glenn Horrocks
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Sydney, Australia
Posts: 17,870
Rep Power: 144 |
Please show an image of what you are seeing.
|
|
January 31, 2017, 17:25 |
|
#3 |
Member
Ftab
Join Date: Sep 2011
Posts: 87
Rep Power: 15 |
Hi Glenn,
Thanks for your reply. Here is the link for the image: https://drive.google.com/open?id=0Bw...kRhc1BuNXZQeWc As you can see, the probe shows the velocity on the orders of 1e-8, while the legend shows 1e-2. |
|
January 31, 2017, 17:42 |
|
#4 |
Super Moderator
Glenn Horrocks
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Sydney, Australia
Posts: 17,870
Rep Power: 144 |
This appears to be related tho this FAQ: https://www.cfd-online.com/Wiki/Ansy...t_the_walls.3F
|
|
February 1, 2017, 10:47 |
|
#5 | |
Member
Ftab
Join Date: Sep 2011
Posts: 87
Rep Power: 15 |
Quote:
Switching between HYBRID and CONSERVATIVE options in advanced setting of contour, I still see the velocity in the range of 1e-2, which is far different from 1e-8 the probe corectly shows. I want to mention again that the problem is on the interface of fluid-porous. Probe prints the correct value, contour plot not (both Hybrid and conservative) |
||
February 1, 2017, 11:11 |
|
#6 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Jun 2009
Posts: 174
Rep Power: 17 |
Why don't you export those data on the face to check physically?
|
|
April 16, 2020, 00:57 |
|
#7 |
New Member
Michael Fily
Join Date: Feb 2019
Posts: 24
Rep Power: 7 |
Hi!
Perhaps it's been a long time, but do you know how to solve it? |
|
Tags |
cfd post, contour, probe |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Fluent export - CFD Post - Airfoil Results | Wingman | ANSYS | 0 | November 18, 2016 17:36 |
View results at a contact region in CFD post | AGP | FLUENT | 0 | June 10, 2014 12:11 |
CFD Post crashed | davidwilcox | FLUENT | 1 | February 23, 2013 01:41 |
Cfd post | Manish Kumar | ANSYS | 2 | February 22, 2013 01:29 |
Automated post processing using CFD Post | shreyasr | ANSYS | 0 | January 28, 2013 07:21 |