|
[Sponsors] |
Acceptance of result when artificial wall is placed |
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Search this Thread | Display Modes |
November 10, 2016, 09:00 |
Acceptance of result when artificial wall is placed
|
#1 |
Senior Member
sluzzer
Join Date: Jul 2014
Posts: 146
Rep Power: 12 |
In a situation where solution is converged to the requirements, but artificial wall is placed at the outlet (or inlet) by the silver, can we accept the result as final?
If we accept that as final, then calculation of mass flow rate at that face or boundary condition, will give the actual mass flow rate or reduced mass flow rate due to recirculation and artificial wall placement? |
|
November 10, 2016, 10:21 |
|
#2 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Jun 2009
Posts: 1,880
Rep Power: 33 |
That is your decision, and it can only be made upon further analysis of the results.
For example, there are artificial walls, but how much of the total area is reduced ? How does the flow looks like around the modified area ? Is it possible to modify the model geometry a bit near such boundary to prevent the creation of these artificial walls. |
|
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Natural convection in a closed domain STILL NEEDING help! | Yr0gErG | FLUENT | 4 | December 2, 2019 01:04 |
Radiation in semi-transparent media with surface-to-surface model? | mpeppels | CFX | 11 | August 22, 2019 08:30 |
Enhanced Wall Treatment | paduchev | FLUENT | 24 | January 8, 2018 12:55 |
Difficulty In Setting Boundary Conditions | Moinul Haque | CFX | 4 | November 25, 2014 18:30 |
Is wall ajacent temperature equal to conservative temperature of the wall? | shenying0710 | CFX | 8 | January 4, 2013 05:03 |