CFD Online Logo CFD Online URL
www.cfd-online.com
[Sponsors]
Home > Forums > Software User Forums > ANSYS > CFX

What is the original reference of the Resistance Loss Coefficient in ANSYS CFX?

Register Blogs Community New Posts Updated Threads Search

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
Old   August 6, 2016, 12:29
Smile What is the original reference of the Resistance Loss Coefficient in ANSYS CFX?
  #1
New Member
 
Kent Kim
Join Date: Jul 2016
Posts: 3
Rep Power: 10
lchhung is on a distinguished road
Dear colleagues,
I am just a beginner in CFD simulation using ANSYS CFX. I am looking for the exact original reference of the Resistance Loss Coefficient in the Loss Model adopted in the CFX program.
I have checked with the Ergun equation and the Forchheimer equation but those do not make any sense to me.
I would be grateful if you could please suggest any ideas.
Thank you,
lchhung
lchhung is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   August 8, 2016, 12:18
Default
  #2
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Posts: 1,880
Rep Power: 33
Opaque will become famous soon enough
It would be great if you write the equations you are comparing for those in the forum to help you. Porous media vocabulary varies depending your area of interest; therefore, it is easier to look at equations directly.

Keep in mind the software provides a general framework for the user (us) to implement the specifics of a model of interest. By comparing the equations, we can see how the can be matched.

Hope the above helps,
Opaque is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   August 8, 2016, 14:40
Default
  #3
New Member
 
Kent Kim
Join Date: Jul 2016
Posts: 3
Rep Power: 10
lchhung is on a distinguished road
Hi Opaque,
Thank you for writing me.

I have found the original equation.

The original reference is the work of Ergun (1952).

I downloaded the paper via:

https://www.scribd.com/doc/306554469...-Columns-Ergun

I write here for other guys, who might look for the same problem in the future.

Kind regards,
lchhung

Quote:
Originally Posted by Opaque View Post
It would be great if you write the equations you are comparing for those in the forum to help you. .......................,
lchhung is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   August 8, 2016, 16:20
Default
  #4
Senior Member
 
Erik
Join Date: Feb 2011
Location: Earth (Land portion)
Posts: 1,188
Rep Power: 23
evcelica is on a distinguished road
Pressure Drop per Unit Length = [(Viscosity / KPerm) * Velocity] + [Kloss * (Density/2) * Velocity^2]

Where KPerm is the permeability and Kloss is the quadratic loss coefficient.
The linear component of this source represents viscous losses and the quadratic term represents inertial losses.
evcelica is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   April 12, 2019, 06:19
Default
  #5
Member
 
Abdullah Arslan
Join Date: Apr 2019
Posts: 94
Rep Power: 7
Goenitz is on a distinguished road
Quote:
Originally Posted by evcelica View Post
Pressure Drop per Unit Length = [(Viscosity / KPerm) * Velocity] + [Kloss * (Density/2) * Velocity^2]

Where KPerm is the permeability and Kloss is the quadratic loss coefficient.
The linear component of this source represents viscous losses and the quadratic term represents inertial losses.
In cfx resistance loss coefficient has units (1/m) I don't think inertial loss coefficient has any...
Goenitz is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   July 11, 2019, 10:45
Default
  #6
Member
 
Abdullah Arslan
Join Date: Apr 2019
Posts: 94
Rep Power: 7
Goenitz is on a distinguished road
Quote:
Originally Posted by evcelica View Post
Pressure Drop per Unit Length = [(Viscosity / KPerm) * Velocity] + [Kloss * (Density/2) * Velocity^2]

Where KPerm is the permeability and Kloss is the quadratic loss coefficient.
The linear component of this source represents viscous losses and the quadratic term represents inertial losses.
Hi

What do you think density will be? of fluid mixture or fluid mixture+foam density?
Goenitz is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   July 11, 2019, 12:20
Default
  #7
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Posts: 1,880
Rep Power: 33
Opaque will become famous soon enough
Based on Ergun's reference, as you pointed out:

Quote:
The equation has been examined from the point of view of its dependence upon flow rate, properties of the fluids, and fractional void volume,orientation, size, shape, and surface of the granular solids.
It can only be the fluid density.
Opaque is offline   Reply With Quote

Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
mass flow in is not equal to mass flow out saii CFX 12 March 19, 2018 06:21
Simulation of a single bubble with a VOF-method Suzzn CFX 21 January 29, 2018 01:58
Question about heat transfer coefficient setting for CFX Anna Tian CFX 1 June 16, 2013 07:28
Automotive test case vinz OpenFOAM Running, Solving & CFD 98 October 27, 2008 09:43
Two-Phase Buoyant Flow Issue Miguel Baritto CFX 4 August 31, 2006 13:02


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 22:04.