|
[Sponsors] |
How does the CFX distinguish between Turbine and Compressor? |
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Search this Thread | Display Modes |
August 6, 2016, 03:10 |
How does the CFX distinguish between Turbine and Compressor?
|
#1 |
Senior Member
sluzzer
Join Date: Jul 2014
Posts: 146
Rep Power: 12 |
There is a option only to specify the Speed of rotation.
How does the CFX knows whether the work is added or extracted? |
|
August 6, 2016, 07:39 |
|
#2 |
Super Moderator
Glenn Horrocks
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Sydney, Australia
Posts: 17,870
Rep Power: 144 |
CFX is a Navier Stokes solver, and uses a mesh to discretise the volume. This means the flow is evaluated at each control volume in the domain based on the conditions which apply to it. The work done or absorbed by the rotors is calculated by the integral of the forces acting on the body applied at the control volumes.
When you sum up all the contributions by the control volumes you get quantities like net torque, power and flow rate. These are global quantities which engineers use to describe a flow, but CFX only sees it a zillions of little control volumes. |
|
August 6, 2016, 07:54 |
|
#3 |
Senior Member
sluzzer
Join Date: Jul 2014
Posts: 146
Rep Power: 12 |
For example let's take a 2 similar rotor blade model..
One should be analysed like a compressor, that is, it is rotated by the mechanical energy Another should be analysed like a turbine, that is, the flow rotates the rotor.. How we will distinguish these two model in CFX pre setup? |
|
August 6, 2016, 08:49 |
|
#4 |
Super Moderator
Glenn Horrocks
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Sydney, Australia
Posts: 17,870
Rep Power: 144 |
The same way as a turbine and a compressor are different in real life. It has to be designed right and the flow conditions applied correctly such that it is in the flow regime where it behaves as expected.
This means that the conditions the flow sees are such that its pressure increases as the flow progresses (ie a compressor), or the fluid does work on the blade and spins it (ie a turbine). If you don't know what design features and flow conditions are required for a compressor or turbine then you better consult a turbomachinery design textbook (such as The Thermodynamics of Turbomachinery by Dixon). |
|
August 6, 2016, 09:00 |
|
#5 |
Senior Member
sluzzer
Join Date: Jul 2014
Posts: 146
Rep Power: 12 |
Thanks for your suggestion ghorrocks!
If we give high pressure at the outlet and low pressure at the inlet, then the CFX may understand that the pressure is increasing downstream and it is a compressor! But what if I apply a low pressure at the inlet and mass flow rate at the outlet as Boundary condition?? |
|
August 6, 2016, 09:28 |
|
#6 | |
Super Moderator
Glenn Horrocks
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Sydney, Australia
Posts: 17,870
Rep Power: 144 |
Quote:
Let me explain it differently. The angle of attack of the fluid on the blade determines the force on the blade, and the force on the blade determines the power input or output. So simply changing the AOA from positive to negative will change from positive to negative torque, and will mean the device changes from being a compressor to a turbine (or possibly to just a dead weight . |
||
August 6, 2016, 09:30 |
|
#7 |
Senior Member
sluzzer
Join Date: Jul 2014
Posts: 146
Rep Power: 12 |
Understood thanks a lot
|
|
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Axial compressor calculation steps? | olegmang | CFX | 38 | March 1, 2018 12:14 |
Compressor Blade Analysis in Ansys CFX | LynchMobster47 | Main CFD Forum | 0 | April 10, 2012 23:43 |
Boundary condition setting regarding turbine simulation using CFX | Lacerlacer | CFX | 11 | March 12, 2012 10:32 |
boundary conditions turbine | riesotto | OpenFOAM | 0 | February 22, 2012 16:05 |
HAWT, should we use sliding meshes? or the UDF? | f0208secretx | FLUENT | 11 | February 19, 2012 06:58 |