|
[Sponsors] |
In buoyancy mode, how can we define the material for the object? |
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Search this Thread | Display Modes |
April 26, 2016, 11:41 |
In buoyancy mode, how can we define the material for the object?
|
#1 |
New Member
vhluu
Join Date: Apr 2016
Posts: 7
Rep Power: 10 |
I am running CFX for investigate the hydrodynamic characteristic for my concrete block. I found that the buoyancy model results more accurate than non-buoyancy mode, and its picture is attached in this mail as well.
I realized that in buoyancy mode, my result is wrong due to automatically setting for default material for the block. Do any body know how to change the density for the block? images upload Thanks so much if you can help me to solve out this problems. |
|
April 26, 2016, 22:49 |
|
#2 |
Super Moderator
Glenn Horrocks
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Sydney, Australia
Posts: 17,854
Rep Power: 144 |
You can set the density in the material properties. But why are you modelling the density of the concrete block? It is only relevant if you are modelling CHT or rigid body dynamics - but your simulation looks like just flow over the block and density of the block is not significant for that.
|
|
April 27, 2016, 06:14 |
|
#3 | |
New Member
vhluu
Join Date: Apr 2016
Posts: 7
Rep Power: 10 |
Quote:
I had a look on geometry and CFX, but they seem like have only solid material. If i add data engineering and set concrete as main material for all solid. We need to define some unexpected factors in mesh model like stress analysis, so i find other easy way to solve the problem. |
||
April 28, 2016, 10:15 |
|
#4 |
Super Moderator
Glenn Horrocks
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Sydney, Australia
Posts: 17,854
Rep Power: 144 |
You predict the lift on a body by integration the wall force acting on the body by the fluid. This gives you the fluid force vector. You don't model the weight of the body itself. You seem to have misunderstood this type of simulation. Have you looked at the CFX tutorial examples of fluid flows over bodies?
|
|
April 29, 2016, 04:07 |
|
#5 | |
New Member
vhluu
Join Date: Apr 2016
Posts: 7
Rep Power: 10 |
Quote:
Have u ever meet this sistuation before? I am not quite clear about this point, so If you can explain a bit for me. I am so happy and appreciate. Regard Viet Hung |
||
April 29, 2016, 04:22 |
|
#6 |
Super Moderator
Glenn Horrocks
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Sydney, Australia
Posts: 17,854
Rep Power: 144 |
The weight of the body is easily added by hand to the buoyancy force calculated by CFD. So you don't model the weight but add it afterwards.
Unless you are a rigid body motion simulation then you do need the body mass - but you have not mentioned that so I assume you are not doing a rigid body simulation. |
|
April 29, 2016, 04:43 |
|
#7 | |
New Member
vhluu
Join Date: Apr 2016
Posts: 7
Rep Power: 10 |
Quote:
For the buoyancy mode, the result of lift is about 18N at velocity of 0.6 m/s. But the buoyancy mode got the total force is -28N. The hand calculation for buoyancy is about 586N (Volume = 0.6 cubic metter), the mass is 145,6 kg, so I think I apply the wrong boundary layer. My project is very simple, just investigating the lift and drag due to the fluid acting on body. So i defined the boundary such as: Inlet (inlet ) = 0.6 m/s Out let (Opening) Pa =0 atm. I just worry Pa = 0 (touch with environment or Pa= rho.g.h (hydrostatic pressure) ) Other boundary is defined wall function. Can you check it again for me please? Regard |
||
April 29, 2016, 04:46 |
|
#8 | |
New Member
vhluu
Join Date: Apr 2016
Posts: 7
Rep Power: 10 |
Quote:
If i want to add rigid motion, do i need to seperate two solid without using distract Boolean methodology? |
||
April 29, 2016, 05:33 |
|
#9 |
Super Moderator
Glenn Horrocks
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Sydney, Australia
Posts: 17,854
Rep Power: 144 |
Do not consider doing a rigid body simulation until you can do accurate fixed mesh simulations. So stay with fixed mesh simulations for now.
You will probably have to account for the hydrostatic pressure in your outlet boundary. have a look at how the flow over a bump tutorial does it. |
|
April 29, 2016, 06:40 |
|
#10 | |
New Member
vhluu
Join Date: Apr 2016
Posts: 7
Rep Power: 10 |
Quote:
|
||
April 29, 2016, 09:56 |
|
#11 |
Super Moderator
Glenn Horrocks
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Sydney, Australia
Posts: 17,854
Rep Power: 144 |
The example is in the CFX tutorials, provided with the standard ANSYS installation.
|
|
April 30, 2016, 10:20 |
|
#12 | |
New Member
vhluu
Join Date: Apr 2016
Posts: 7
Rep Power: 10 |
Quote:
Finally I have done my work with buoyant force, and CFX did a good job. I just misunderstood about the define of hydrostatic pressure, but Ansys automatically calculate this kind of pressure for me. So in the outlet i just defined relative pressure at 0 Pa and it is working. Thanks and best regard Viet Hung |
||
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Ansys CFX problem: unexpected very high temperatures in premix laminar combustion | faizan_habib7 | CFX | 4 | February 1, 2016 18:00 |
Compilation error OF1.5-dev on Suse10.3 | darenyang | OpenFOAM Installation | 0 | April 29, 2009 05:55 |
[blockMesh] BlockMeshmergePatchPairs | hjasak | OpenFOAM Meshing & Mesh Conversion | 11 | August 15, 2008 08:36 |
material define | mike | FLUENT | 1 | May 29, 2006 12:40 |
user material for object | dilip | Phoenics | 2 | October 17, 2000 01:48 |