|
[Sponsors] |
April 12, 2016, 15:43 |
Notice repeated in CFX solver manager
|
#1 |
New Member
Ibadullah
Join Date: Jan 2016
Posts: 21
Rep Power: 10 |
Dear all,
I need assistance in CFX. Below is the message that occurs in solver manager during iterations. So should i have to continue my iteration till convergence or i have to cater that notice. The solver manager still running with this message so should i have to wait till its convergence as i am upgrading my iterations during its running. Please help i am very thankful if someone sort me out from this. A wall has been placed at portion(s) of an OUTLET | | boundary condition (at 31.8% of the faces, 17.3% of the area) | | to prevent fluid from flowing into the domain. | | The boundary condition name is: output 1. | | The fluid name is: water. | | If this situation persists, consider switching | | to an Opening type boundary condition instead. |
|
April 12, 2016, 21:47 |
|
#2 |
Super Moderator
Glenn Horrocks
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Sydney, Australia
Posts: 17,854
Rep Power: 144 |
||
April 13, 2016, 05:25 |
|
#3 |
New Member
Ibadullah
Join Date: Jan 2016
Posts: 21
Rep Power: 10 |
Thanks ghorocks it is informative. Actually that message disappears after increasing my time scale but the result is still not converging as solver has done iterations up to 675. some of the equations results were repeated in most of the iterations but unable to produce the produce the consecutive same results so that the convergence will occur. so what did u suggest should i have to wait until its convergence or what i have to do. plz suggest. the pic of graph is shown in attached file.
|
|
April 13, 2016, 05:56 |
|
#4 |
Senior Member
Maxim
Join Date: Aug 2015
Location: Germany
Posts: 413
Rep Power: 13 |
sometimes starting with a larger time step helps to 'flush' the domains and establish the right flow direction. You should also watch the imbalances during the run.
Later (according to your screenshot: now) you could use a smaller time step which might help your simulation to converge further. But I think this is already explained in the FAQ and the wiki here. |
|
April 13, 2016, 08:59 |
|
#5 |
Super Moderator
Glenn Horrocks
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Sydney, Australia
Posts: 17,854
Rep Power: 144 |
That's right maxim, Ibadullah's question is a different FAQ now: http://www.cfd-online.com/Wiki/Ansys...gence_criteria
|
|
April 13, 2016, 10:02 |
|
#6 |
New Member
Ibadullah
Join Date: Jan 2016
Posts: 21
Rep Power: 10 |
Thanks maxima for ur reply. I did what u said but no convergence takes place as it becomes smooth for a short time but after some iterations the same message starts occurring so I have decided to change my outlet condition from average static pressure to simply a static pressure. I hope it will work as this is the most robust option i learned in CFX pre guide.
|
|
April 13, 2016, 12:38 |
Need help in CFX pre
|
#7 |
New Member
Ibadullah
Join Date: Jan 2016
Posts: 21
Rep Power: 10 |
Dear all,
I am facing that error problem shown below. The figure of geometry is also shown below. By viewing fig i dont think so that flow seperation can occur at the outlet but the problem persist. In fig the water is injected from small nozzle situated on throat area and air is injected from input of big nozzle from left side. Notice ****** | A wall has been placed at portion(s) of an OUTLET | | boundary condition (at 31.8% of the faces, 17.3% of the area) | | to prevent fluid from flowing into the domain. | | The boundary condition name is: output 1. | | The fluid name is: water. | | If this situation persists, consider switching | | to an Opening type boundary condition instead +--------------------------------------------------------------------+ i have tried many options such as 1. changing the outlet boundary condition from average static pressure to simply static pressure. 2. then changing the outlet boundary condition to mass flow rate that i am using in the domain (total mass flow rate of air plus the water). 3. by controlling the timescale factor in above two options but convergence did not occur and the same message will occur after some iterations. So should i have to amends in my geometry by increasing the diverging angle from 3.8 to 5 or some better option can any one tell me. I shall be very thankful if someone sort me out from this problem. |
|
April 13, 2016, 19:41 |
|
#8 |
Super Moderator
Glenn Horrocks
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Sydney, Australia
Posts: 17,854
Rep Power: 144 |
Your geometry is liable to have a large separation in it (in the diffuser section), so it is no surprise you are getting the warning about reverse flow at the outlet.
In this case forget about fiddling with solver settings and move the outlet boundary downstream far enough that the flow has got past any recirculations. Note this can be quite a distance in some cases. |
|
April 14, 2016, 11:35 |
Waiting for reply (CFX Problem)
|
#9 |
New Member
Ibadullah
Join Date: Jan 2016
Posts: 21
Rep Power: 10 |
thanks ghorocks for ur reply.
There is one query in my mind that my diffuser angle in this case is 3.8 whereas i read in one of the link that the diffuser angle should be between 5 to 8. So I think i should increase the diffuser angle instead of increasing the length of the diverging section or moving downstream the outlet section. What do you suggest https://www.quora.com/Why-is-the-len...the-converging |
|
April 14, 2016, 19:59 |
|
#10 |
Super Moderator
Glenn Horrocks
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Sydney, Australia
Posts: 17,854
Rep Power: 144 |
First of all: do not PM with duplicates of messages you post on the forum. I find that very annoying. If it is on the forum I will see it.
You can do whatever you like, only you know the purpose of why you are doing this model so only you can say what is an appropriate way forwards. Which ever approach you decide to use, you will find convergence much easier if you arrange it so the flow is all in the forwards direction at the outlet with no recirculations. You can do that by changing the diffuser angle, adding a straight section of pipe at the end, discharging into a large box, or many other method. Whatever straightens the flow out. |
|
April 15, 2016, 16:50 |
|
#11 |
New Member
Ibadullah
Join Date: Jan 2016
Posts: 21
Rep Power: 10 |
Thanks for ur reply and sorry for the private message as i dont know that you dont like pm because I am new in this forum. Once again I am sorry for that.
|
|
Tags |
cfx solver manager |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Error in CFX Solver Manager | newbie384 | CFX | 1 | April 3, 2014 02:21 |
CFX Solver Reynolds Number | haider760 | CFX | 2 | March 4, 2012 23:05 |
Error in CFX Solver | Leuchte | CFX | 5 | November 6, 2010 07:12 |
CFX Solver Memory Error | mike | CFX | 1 | March 19, 2008 08:22 |
CFX 5.5 | Roued | CFX | 1 | October 2, 2001 17:49 |