|
[Sponsors] |
March 5, 2016, 03:05 |
Interface and domain in rotational flow
|
#1 |
New Member
M.A.
Join Date: Dec 2015
Posts: 6
Rep Power: 10 |
Good day Sirs!
I am simulating a multiphase cross flow turbine and I uploaded 2 pictures as a reference for my 2 questions. One is a picture of my old model and the other is the new one. I have three domains now (see reference picture). The brown one is the "CASING". The green one is the "BLADES". The blue one is the "INNER PART". Initially I only had two domains which is the CASING and the "Whole Rotor", but i separated the Whole Rotor to 2 parts as BLADES and INNER PART for meshing purposes. Question on Domain Motion: The CASING domain is set as stationary. The BLADES domain is set as rotating. should I set the INNER PART as rotating? or i should leave it as stationary? Question on Interfaces: 2. the CASING and BLADES are connected via "Frozen Rotor" frame change setting. What should be my frame change setting on the interface between BLADES and INNER PART? Is it also Frozen Rotor? Thank you very much sirs I got a bit confused as I separated the Whole Rotor domain to two parts. |
|
March 5, 2016, 05:57 |
|
#2 |
Super Moderator
Glenn Horrocks
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Sydney, Australia
Posts: 17,854
Rep Power: 144 |
I would make it a rotating frame of reference because then you do not need a frame of reference change at the GGI.
|
|
March 5, 2016, 12:39 |
|
#3 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Jun 2009
Posts: 174
Rep Power: 17 |
At first, you will need small extensions upstream and downstream of the blade domain to ensure a good interfacing. If you want to get performance far downstream of the turbine blade, you will need to go with a separate stationary domain like you did for the new model. Since you have a 360 deg blade domain, no choices but to apply the frozen rotor if steady state solution is wanted. BTW what is the application and working fluid? Curious 'cause you said of multiphase.
|
|
March 21, 2016, 01:20 |
|
#4 | |
New Member
M.A.
Join Date: Dec 2015
Posts: 6
Rep Power: 10 |
Quote:
Body forces -> Volume-Weighted Velocity Pressure Coupling -> Rhie Chow 4th Multiphase Control -> Volume Fraction coupling I did not have formal training on CFX and i cannot fully grasp the CFX guides. Thanks turbo. |
||
March 21, 2016, 01:22 |
|
#5 | |
New Member
M.A.
Join Date: Dec 2015
Posts: 6
Rep Power: 10 |
Quote:
I am still refining my simulation, Should I include the following settings below? (for the Advanced Settings Tab of Solver Control): Velocity Pressure Coupling -------> Rhie Chow 4th order Multiphase Control --------> Volume Fraction coupling Body forces --------> Volume-Weighted I am using the default setting, wherein none of those three are set. I cannot fully grasp their definitions in the CFX guide. |
||
Tags |
cfx, cross flow, interface, multiphase |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
sliding mesh problem in CFX | Saima | CFX | 46 | September 11, 2021 08:38 |
Radiation in semi-transparent media with surface-to-surface model? | mpeppels | CFX | 11 | August 22, 2019 08:30 |
Question about heat transfer coefficient setting for CFX | Anna Tian | CFX | 1 | June 16, 2013 07:28 |
Error finding variable "THERMX" | sunilpatil | CFX | 8 | April 26, 2013 08:00 |
RPM in Wind Turbine | Pankaj | CFX | 9 | November 23, 2009 05:05 |