|
[Sponsors] |
moving mesh simulation: cavity with a moving lid cover |
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Search this Thread | Display Modes |
December 20, 2015, 20:20 |
moving mesh simulation: cavity with a moving lid cover
|
#1 |
Member
Join Date: May 2013
Posts: 45
Rep Power: 13 |
Hello all CFX subforum members,
I'd like to simulate transient effect of moving a car's sunroof back and forth while the car is in motion. The model has been simplified as a cavity which has a lid cover, and the velocity of the lid is constant with time. I've tried to look into the ball valve example in the CFX-Pre documentation, but I think that my case is different as the lid 's mesh is not contained within the domain, but it's connected to the external boundary. I wonder how to setup the mesh and CFX-Pre in this case. Thanks in advance. |
|
December 20, 2015, 23:44 |
|
#2 |
Super Moderator
Glenn Horrocks
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Sydney, Australia
Posts: 17,870
Rep Power: 144 |
This sounds straight forward to set up. This simple drawing shows one setup which should work.
Example.png |
|
December 21, 2015, 02:21 |
|
#3 | |
Member
Join Date: May 2013
Posts: 45
Rep Power: 13 |
Quote:
I'm kind of lost looking for proper tutorial. |
||
December 21, 2015, 02:31 |
|
#4 |
Super Moderator
Glenn Horrocks
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Sydney, Australia
Posts: 17,870
Rep Power: 144 |
If the tutorials you can find don't help much:
1) Download more tutorials from the ANSYS community webpage (www.ansys.com) 2) Talk to ANSYS support and get some tutorials off them If that does not work give it a go and post what you get here. Post an image of what you are doing and your CCL and output file (showing any error messages). We will do what we can to help. |
|
December 21, 2015, 18:06 |
|
#5 | |
Member
Join Date: May 2013
Posts: 45
Rep Power: 13 |
Quote:
But uh, a few questions first: 1. If I use mesh deformation option, then when the lid moves across the moving domain, would the length-wise spacing of the moving domain become stretched/compressed or would the number of grid will be added/reduced to match surrounding vertices? 2. Does CFX needs to re-mesh the domain for every timestep? (I used structured hexa-meshing in ICEM, which was then converted to unstructured .cfx5 mesh) |
||
December 21, 2015, 18:23 |
|
#6 |
Super Moderator
Glenn Horrocks
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Sydney, Australia
Posts: 17,870
Rep Power: 144 |
You can handle quite a large range of motion with moving mesh only, just stretching the existing mesh. Also note you will need transient rotor-stator interfaces on the interfaces with the stationary domains so the interface can be recalculated.
No need for remeshing. This is a single mesh which is deformed. (Except if you want to run the lid to full closure, then you will have to remesh to handle this). A final comment: Are you sure the opening of the lid is important? If the lid opens on a slower timescale than the flow, then this can be modelled as a series of steady state simulations with meshes at various stages of opening. This is MUCH simpler to do, so if it is appropriate then I would recommend you do it this way. |
|
December 22, 2015, 18:13 |
|
#7 | |
Member
Join Date: May 2013
Posts: 45
Rep Power: 13 |
Quote:
However, I'm unsure of getting steadystate result as cavity flow is naturally unsteady. I'm afraid that the result would be inaccurate. |
||
December 22, 2015, 18:29 |
|
#8 |
Super Moderator
Glenn Horrocks
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Sydney, Australia
Posts: 17,870
Rep Power: 144 |
Yes, the flow is likely to be inherently unsteady. If the free stream velocity is supersonic then you really need to separate the time scales - which means do runs at fixed opening positions. So these are likely to be transient runs, but with a fixed mesh and that makes things easier.
|
|
Tags |
cavity, cfx, transient |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
[snappyHexMesh] Add Mesh Layers doesnt work on the whole surface | Kryo | OpenFOAM Meshing & Mesh Conversion | 13 | February 17, 2022 08:34 |
decomposePar problem: Cell 0contains face labels out of range | vaina74 | OpenFOAM Pre-Processing | 37 | July 20, 2020 06:38 |
Question on moving mesh, mesh velocity is really small! | ripperjack | Main CFD Forum | 2 | April 28, 2014 14:37 |
whats difference between GGI,AMI,MRF for moving mesh simulation? | immortality | OpenFOAM Running, Solving & CFD | 1 | January 31, 2013 13:27 |
Moving mesh in Fluent | fivos | FLUENT | 0 | April 2, 2010 10:45 |