|
[Sponsors] |
Is there any advantage of having single mesh file in single domain? |
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Search this Thread | Display Modes |
October 11, 2015, 01:01 |
Is there any advantage of having single mesh file in single domain?
|
#1 |
Senior Member
sluzzer
Join Date: Jul 2014
Posts: 146
Rep Power: 12 |
I want to keep only one domain for using mesh adaptation in my simulation...
But my geometry is complex and having 3 3D regions... All 3 files are structured mesh.. I merged the 3 files by merging blocking topo, merging bodies, merging vertices at the interfaces and keeping all the blocks in that single body and deleted the interface surface mesh (still I couldn't get continuous domain!!) Then I tried to keep the 3 bodies in the same domain (since all r stationary) and created domain interface to join the mesh files within the same domain! It worked and I am able to use mesh adaptation! Now my question is, many times many persons tries to merge the meshes (there are so many questions for merging structured mesh in this forum).. If at all we can keep all the meshes within single domain using domain interfaces, then wat is the use of merging meshes? |
|
October 11, 2015, 06:30 |
|
#2 |
Super Moderator
Glenn Horrocks
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Sydney, Australia
Posts: 17,871
Rep Power: 144 |
There is a price to pay when you use interfaces. It increases memory use, slows the simulation down and causes additional blurring of the variable fields at the interface. Whether this is significant or not depends on the simulation. But most of the time these issues do not matter and it can make generating meshes much easier so it can help a lot.
|
|
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
[OpenFOAM.org] Patches to compile OpenFOAM 2.2 on Mac OS X | gschaider | OpenFOAM Installation | 136 | October 10, 2017 18:25 |
[swak4Foam] swak4foam building problem | GGerber | OpenFOAM Community Contributions | 54 | April 24, 2015 17:02 |
[OpenFOAM] Annoying issue of automatic "Rescale to Data Range " with paraFoam/paraview 3.12 | keepfit | ParaView | 60 | September 18, 2013 04:23 |
[swak4Foam] funkySetFields compilation error | tayo | OpenFOAM Community Contributions | 39 | December 3, 2012 06:18 |
[blockMesh] Axisymmetrical mesh | Rasmus Gjesing (Gjesing) | OpenFOAM Meshing & Mesh Conversion | 10 | April 2, 2007 15:00 |