|
[Sponsors] |
Compression stoke is giving higher pressure than calculated |
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Search this Thread | Display Modes |
April 14, 2015, 03:31 |
|
#21 |
Member
Nick
Join Date: Apr 2015
Posts: 40
Rep Power: 11 |
Using PV^gamma= constant, I got pressure value. For 15 compression ratio I got pressure value 45 bar. I know initial pressure(P1), initial volume(V1), final volume(V2) and from above equation I got final pressure. Inside the cylinder, pressure would be around 45 bar before Ignition.
|
|
April 14, 2015, 03:44 |
|
#22 |
Super Moderator
Glenn Horrocks
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Sydney, Australia
Posts: 17,852
Rep Power: 144 |
In that case you are comparing against analytical values.
I have done this sort of modelling before with CFX and got within 1% of the analytical values so if you set it up correctly it can be done very accurately. I recommend you draw a simple box with a hex mesh and a laminar flow model. Then you will be a good analog to the analytical equation and when you get this workign well you should be within 1%. You do not need a fine mesh, a 10x10x10 mesh will be fine so the simulations will run in seconds. But you will need to adjust convergence and time step parameters until you get sufficient accuracy. |
|
April 14, 2015, 06:21 |
|
#23 |
Member
Nick
Join Date: Apr 2015
Posts: 40
Rep Power: 11 |
Then how will I get other results If I use laminar model. My main aim is to compare squish, TKE, Turbulence. If I do what you said I will get required pressure but there are also other factors I need.
Does CFX simulates real compression and not idealised isentropic compression ? You want me to change properties of Air Ideal gas..? |
|
April 14, 2015, 07:38 |
|
#24 | ||
Super Moderator
Glenn Horrocks
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Sydney, Australia
Posts: 17,852
Rep Power: 144 |
You missed my point. I recommend you do a simple benchmark case where you can run it quickly and when it is working properly you should get very accurate answers to the analytical solution. When you know how to get this simple benchmark case accurate then you use the same method on your real case and the compression modelling should be accurate.
Quote:
Quote:
|
|||
April 14, 2015, 07:49 |
|
#25 |
Member
Nick
Join Date: Apr 2015
Posts: 40
Rep Power: 11 |
what I meant is does pressure rise is more because of the property of the gas..?
|
|
April 14, 2015, 07:52 |
|
#26 |
Member
Nick
Join Date: Apr 2015
Posts: 40
Rep Power: 11 |
Now I am doing simulation with flat piston with only 37 thousand elements. Now you want me to change turbulence model to laminar and see what happens, correct..?
|
|
April 14, 2015, 08:07 |
|
#27 | ||
Super Moderator
Glenn Horrocks
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Sydney, Australia
Posts: 17,852
Rep Power: 144 |
Quote:
Quote:
Just checking - you took the reference pressure into account when you did this, did you? |
|||
April 14, 2015, 08:42 |
|
#28 |
Member
Nick
Join Date: Apr 2015
Posts: 40
Rep Power: 11 |
Yes initial pressure is 1 bar I took
|
|
April 14, 2015, 09:40 |
|
#29 |
Super Moderator
Glenn Horrocks
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Sydney, Australia
Posts: 17,852
Rep Power: 144 |
The initial pressure is 1 bar gauge, with a 1 atm reference. So your initial pressure is 201.3 kPa. Is that what you mean? Because that is what your CCL says you modelled.
|
|
April 14, 2015, 10:53 |
|
#30 |
Member
Nick
Join Date: Apr 2015
Posts: 40
Rep Power: 11 |
No.... During suction air will be at 1 bar pressure. 1 bar pressure is compressed. I think I have made mistake in that .
Can you please say how you got 201.3 KPa ? |
|
April 14, 2015, 15:04 |
|
#31 |
Member
Nick
Join Date: Apr 2015
Posts: 40
Rep Power: 11 |
I gave reference pressure as 0 atm. Now I am getting 36.5 bar but required is around 44 bar. What should I do now..?
|
|
April 14, 2015, 19:52 |
|
#32 |
Super Moderator
Glenn Horrocks
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Sydney, Australia
Posts: 17,852
Rep Power: 144 |
You don't want to use 0 reference pressure. If it starts at 1 atm pressure then use 1 atm as the reference pressure with 0 Pa initial pressure.
What equation did you use to calculate the expected pressure? What polytropic coefficient did you use? |
|
April 14, 2015, 23:28 |
|
#33 |
Member
Nick
Join Date: Apr 2015
Posts: 40
Rep Power: 11 |
PV^gamma=constant
gamma=1.4 |
|
April 15, 2015, 07:01 |
|
#34 |
Super Moderator
Glenn Horrocks
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Sydney, Australia
Posts: 17,852
Rep Power: 144 |
OK.
My recommendation is already stated: draw a simple rectangular box and compress that. Determine what convergence criteria, time step size and everything else you need to get this accurate and then use these settings on your more complex model. |
|
April 15, 2015, 23:36 |
|
#35 |
Member
Nick
Join Date: Apr 2015
Posts: 40
Rep Power: 11 |
How to get turbulent intensity in CFX post..?
|
|
April 16, 2015, 04:49 |
|
#36 |
Super Moderator
Glenn Horrocks
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Sydney, Australia
Posts: 17,852
Rep Power: 144 |
That's the turbulent kinetic energy variable.
|
|
April 19, 2015, 09:52 |
|
#37 |
Member
Nick
Join Date: Apr 2015
Posts: 40
Rep Power: 11 |
I used tetra mesh to run a case, after 100 iterations the solver stopped saying that
+--------------------------------------------------------------------+ | ERROR #001100279 has occurred in subroutine ErrAction. | | Message: | | Floating point exception: Overflow | | | | | | | | | | | +--------------------------------------------------------------------+ +--------------------------------------------------------------------+ | ERROR #001100279 has occurred in subroutine ErrAction. | | Message: | | Stopped in routine FPX: C_FPX_HANDLER | | | | | | | | | | | +--------------------------------------------------------------------+ I have checked boundary conditions with already corrected case and it is also converging Cant find where the problem is..? Last edited by nickjuana; April 19, 2015 at 11:10. |
|
April 19, 2015, 19:54 |
|
#38 |
Super Moderator
Glenn Horrocks
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Sydney, Australia
Posts: 17,852
Rep Power: 144 |
This is an FAQ: http://www.cfd-online.com/Wiki/Ansys...do_about_it.3F
But in this case I would suspect the mesh quality got bad enough to cause problems. Have a look at the way your mesh squashes up as it moves. |
|
April 19, 2015, 23:33 |
|
#39 |
Member
Nick
Join Date: Apr 2015
Posts: 40
Rep Power: 11 |
Total iterations is 400 and solver has ran more than 100 iterations then also there is a problem with the mesh..?
Tetra mesh quality it was minimum 0.3 |
|
April 20, 2015, 00:11 |
|
#40 |
Super Moderator
Glenn Horrocks
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Sydney, Australia
Posts: 17,852
Rep Power: 144 |
This is a moving mesh simulation - so the mesh changes as the simulation proceeds.
Tet meshes do not squash very well with mesh motion. Hex meshes do this much better as long as the mesh is stacked in the direction of motion. Please post as image of a cross section of your mesh shortly before it crashes. |
|
Tags |
cfx 14.5, engine simulation, pressure boundary |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Pulsatile pressure inlet with pressure outlet | a.lynchy | FLUENT | 3 | March 23, 2012 14:45 |
UDF to define or adjust pressure??? | engahmed | FLUENT | 0 | July 6, 2010 18:19 |
Neumann pressure BC and velocity field | Antech | Main CFD Forum | 0 | April 25, 2006 03:15 |
Gas pressure question | Dan Moskal | Main CFD Forum | 0 | October 24, 2002 23:02 |
Terrible Mistake In Fluid Dynamics History | Abhi | Main CFD Forum | 12 | July 8, 2002 10:11 |