|
[Sponsors] |
March 29, 2015, 13:57 |
Equations of k-Epsilon Model
|
#1 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Aug 2014
Posts: 160
Rep Power: 12 |
Hello,
In the theory guide, it is noted that the term 3* in Equation 2.25 (p. 85) for the turbulence production is based on the “frozen stress” assumption [54]. This prevents the values of Epsilon and k becoming too large through shocks, a situation that becomes progressively worse as the mesh is refined at shocks. I don't understand this explanation. What is meant by ''frozen stress'' and what is the significance of ''shocks'' in this context ? Thank you for your help |
|
March 29, 2015, 19:02 |
|
#2 |
Super Moderator
Glenn Horrocks
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Sydney, Australia
Posts: 17,872
Rep Power: 144 |
I am no expert in turbulence modelling - the manual has a reference for that statement so you will have to look up the reference.
But you should be aware that the shocks they are referring to are compressible flow shock waves. |
|
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Overflow Error in Multiphase Modelling with Two Continuous Fluids | ashtonJ | CFX | 6 | August 11, 2014 15:32 |
Multiphase Homogeneous Model equations | marcoymarc | CFX | 3 | July 3, 2013 20:11 |
An error has occurred in cfx5solve: | volo87 | CFX | 5 | June 14, 2013 18:44 |
Jump in epsilon values near the wall : low re k-epsilon model | malaboss | OpenFOAM Verification & Validation | 1 | February 1, 2013 17:36 |
Reynolds transport, turbulence model, etc | Beginner | Main CFD Forum | 1 | January 7, 2009 06:36 |