CFD Online Logo CFD Online URL
www.cfd-online.com
[Sponsors]
Home > Forums > Software User Forums > ANSYS > CFX

Discontinuity across interfaces

Register Blogs Community New Posts Updated Threads Search

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
Old   March 10, 2015, 23:49
Default Discontinuity across interfaces
  #1
Member
 
Nurzhan
Join Date: Jan 2014
Posts: 56
Rep Power: 12
Nurzhan is on a distinguished road
Hi!

I need your help, experts.

I am using several domains connected by domain interfaces in my simulation, heat diffusion with an internal electrical source (see attached file 'Mesh and Geometry).



All external sides of the assembly insulated, except one on the right hand side. Therefore, during t > 0 s, there is a temperature gradient in the -Z direction. Heat is generated by applying electrical potential across the assembly in Z direction. For a simplicity reason, I set same properties and initial conditions at each domain. Mesh connection type at the interfaces is GGI. The interface model is General Connection, with thermal resistance and electrical resistance set to zero, as I assume that all domains are part of one assembly. During calculation, I checked the convergence of my solution at each time step. The convergence criteria (10^-6) was met using the double precision.

Finally, I compared the temperature in the Z direction calculated by CFX with a 1D analytical solution, given in by Carslaw and Jaeger, and found very good agreement, no discontinuities of temperature across the interfaces in the Z direction.

However, I found that there is a minor discontinuity across the interfaces in the Y direction.



In addition, there is unrealistic power accumulation on the left hand side of my geometry. I reckon the discontinuity across the interfaces in the Y direction and power skewness are interrelated. What can be the reasons of this problems? Is the problem in mesh? What would be the best way to mesh such an assembly? Any other possible pitfalls?

Looking forward for your replies.

Regards,
Nurzhan

Last edited by Nurzhan; March 11, 2015 at 02:58.
Nurzhan is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   March 11, 2015, 00:42
Default
  #2
Super Moderator
 
Glenn Horrocks
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Sydney, Australia
Posts: 17,870
Rep Power: 144
ghorrocks is just really niceghorrocks is just really niceghorrocks is just really niceghorrocks is just really nice
Your image was not posted so I cannot see what you are modelling. So I cannot say anything about the Y discontinuity.

But let me guess about the power accumulation - simulations like this often need convergence on residuals AND imbalances. Are your imbalances small? You might just need to converge more until the imbalances are OK. Most people are happy with 1% imbalance but your requirements may be tighter or looser.
ghorrocks is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   March 11, 2015, 02:59
Default
  #3
Member
 
Nurzhan
Join Date: Jan 2014
Posts: 56
Rep Power: 12
Nurzhan is on a distinguished road
Hi Glenn,

thanks for your prompt reply.

My conservation target is 1%, I will try to make smaller first then.

In addition, you can still open the above pictures if make a write click and select open image. Anyway, I tried to reload the pictures but it failed again.

Thanks,
Nurzhan
Nurzhan is offline   Reply With Quote

Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
What type is defined as the interfaces between stator and stator on OF-2.1.1? renyun0511 OpenFOAM Running, Solving & CFD 3 May 18, 2013 09:11
Discontinuity in interfaces Lugarin FLUENT 0 July 12, 2011 18:53
discontinuity of solution due to interfaces ? T.D. OpenFOAM Running, Solving & CFD 4 December 20, 2010 10:42
Subdomain or Interfaces (CHT) sandeep_tu CFX 8 July 14, 2009 12:06
grid interfaces kiko FLUENT 0 February 13, 2007 11:28


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 13:02.