|
[Sponsors] |
Use of (conservative) velocities at the wall in CEL |
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Search this Thread | Display Modes |
March 9, 2015, 11:07 |
Use of (conservative) velocities at the wall in CEL
|
#1 |
New Member
Jesus Contreras Espada
Join Date: Aug 2011
Location: Switzerland
Posts: 12
Rep Power: 15 |
Hello everybody,
I am trying to set a heat transfer coefficient which is a function of the tangential velocities at the wall. In order to try on an easy example, i made a simple duct with a given temperature at the wall and a heat transfer coefficient given by 100[W/m^2/K] + Velocity u * 10 [W/m^3/K * s] The fluid is water with a velocity (Velocity u) of 1 [m/s] When I postprocess the results I see that the HTC is equal to 100 [W/m^2/K] everywhere although Velocity u (conservative) isn't. I've read everywhere that CEL expressions make use of conservative values. Is this wrong or am I missing anything? Thank's in advance! |
|
March 9, 2015, 11:19 |
|
#2 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Jun 2009
Posts: 1,880
Rep Power: 33 |
You said you set up an expression for HTC, and I assume you meant an external heat transfer coefficient since there is no parameter name Heat Transfer Coefficient for the internal (as in heat transfer between the fluid and the wall). Correct ?
You also indicated the results for the "External" HTC on the boundary remained 100 [W m^-2 K] ; therefore, you assume the code used a Velocity u of 0 [m s^-1] in your expression instead of the velocity associated to control volume at the boundary. correct ? If both of the above are correct, the CEL is using the hybrid value of Velocity u, i.e. 0 [m s^-1] for a stationary wall, and not the "conservative value" you seem to be expecting. Do you need the expression to the conservative value instead ? |
|
March 9, 2015, 11:23 |
|
#3 |
New Member
Jesus Contreras Espada
Join Date: Aug 2011
Location: Switzerland
Posts: 12
Rep Power: 15 |
You are right. I'm talking about the Wall External Heat Transfer Coefficient.
It is also right that the code uses a Velocity u of 0 [m s^-1]. I was expecting the code to use the conservative value. I'd be very thankful if anybody would provide me the expression. |
|
March 9, 2015, 14:44 |
|
#4 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Jun 2009
Posts: 1,880
Rep Power: 33 |
The default behavior of CEL at boundaries may be open to debate. For example, if I set a boundary to a fixed velocity of 0 [m s^-1] and temperature of 300 [K], I would expect that expression evaluated at such boundary use those numbers.
However, I may also want to access the control volume value in some circumstances (depending of numerics details). How could you access such value ? First, you must understand that for most cases, the evaluation at boundary faces are evaluation at the integration points of those faces (read theory doc for i.p and faces details), and values can be associated to those location by interpolating control volume values using the element shape functions, or assigning it the closest (topologically speaking) control volume value. For shape function interpolation, you can use Velocity u.trilin For nearest control volume (topologically speaking), you can use Velocity u.linlin. Hope the above helps, |
|
March 10, 2015, 07:08 |
|
#5 |
New Member
Jesus Contreras Espada
Join Date: Aug 2011
Location: Switzerland
Posts: 12
Rep Power: 15 |
Thanks for your help. It is exactly the control volume values that I want to Access, but both the .linlin and the .trilin options make the solver crash.
---------------------------------- Error in subroutine GETCORE : LIN-LIN is an operator on boundary conditions. GETVAR originally called by subroutine CAL_FLX_BCS +----------------------------------------------------------+ | ERROR #001100279 has occurred in subroutine ErrAction. | | Message: | | Stopped in routine GV_ERROR | | | | | | | | | | | +----------------------------------------------------------+ +----------------------------------------------------------+ | An error has occurred in cfx5solve: | | | | The ANSYS CFX solver exited with return code 1. | | No results file has been created. | +----------------------------------------------------------+ The error occurs when I use the expression Alpha = 100[W/m^2/K] + Velocity u * 10 [W/m^3/K * s] and set Alpha as value for "external" Heat Transfer coefficient at the Wall but also when I set 100[W/m^2/K] + Velocity u * 10 [W/m^3/K * s] inside the field "Heat Trans. Coeff.". Any idea? |
|
March 10, 2015, 07:37 |
|
#6 |
New Member
Jesus Contreras Espada
Join Date: Aug 2011
Location: Switzerland
Posts: 12
Rep Power: 15 |
...of course i use Velocity u.trilin and Velocity u.linlin instead of Velocity u
|
|
Tags |
cel expression, conservative vs hybrid |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
sliding mesh problem in CFX | Saima | CFX | 46 | September 11, 2021 08:38 |
Enhanced Wall Treatment | paduchev | FLUENT | 24 | January 8, 2018 12:55 |
Possible Bug in pimpleFoam (or createPatch) (or fluent3DMeshToFoam) | cfdonline2mohsen | OpenFOAM | 3 | October 21, 2013 10:28 |
Is wall ajacent temperature equal to conservative temperature of the wall? | shenying0710 | CFX | 8 | January 4, 2013 05:03 |
Wall functions | Abhijit Tilak | Main CFD Forum | 6 | February 5, 1999 02:16 |