|
[Sponsors] |
Are extruded boundaries good practice for opening BCs as well? |
![]() |
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Search this Thread | Display Modes |
![]() |
![]() |
#1 |
New Member
Join Date: Jun 2014
Posts: 8
Rep Power: 12 ![]() |
Hi,
Thanks for taking the time to read my post. I'm aware that if you have an outlet it is usually good practice to place/extrude the outlet further downstream to prevent recirculation or inflow. I will be modeling a dynamic domain with several openings and was wondering whether there are any advantages to employing the same technique. Some of the openings are placed relatively close together and I'm worried they may interfere with each other. Does anyone have any comments on this? Thanks for your time. |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#2 |
Super Moderator
Glenn Horrocks
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Sydney, Australia
Posts: 17,816
Rep Power: 144 ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
The golden rule is you put boundary conditions at locations where you can describe the flow, then you select boundary conditions which match that description. If the outlets interfere with each other that either needs to be part of the boundary condition selection or you have to move the boundary to somewhere you can describe the flow.
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
Tags |
cfx 15, extrusion, opening boundary |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
How to set BCs programmatically | incompressible | OpenFOAM Programming & Development | 6 | November 20, 2017 02:47 |
Dealing with BC's in OF 1.6 | vkrastev | OpenFOAM Running, Solving & CFD | 5 | September 4, 2012 11:58 |
[ICEM] Extruded unstructured mesh association with boundaries, volumes, etc. | macfly | ANSYS Meshing & Geometry | 6 | August 7, 2012 16:13 |