|
[Sponsors] |
Porous domain - Volume porosity change ... no effect?? |
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Search this Thread | Display Modes |
February 20, 2015, 13:09 |
Porous domain - Volume porosity change ... no effect??
|
#1 |
Senior Member
Roland Rakos
Join Date: Mar 2009
Posts: 131
Rep Power: 17 |
Hello All,
I need to simulate an oil filter. I calculate it with porous domain but there is a thing which is not ok for me; I define 3 parameters; 1. volume porosity 2. press. loss.coeff. 3. Permeability If I decrease the volume porosity then the velocity increases in the porous domain. It is OK. But the pressure drop doesn't change. I think, if the velocity increases then the pressure drop should increase too. But the pressure frop total same both of case of volume porosity values. What is the problem?? Thanks Roland |
|
February 21, 2015, 11:55 |
|
#2 |
Senior Member
Erik
Join Date: Feb 2011
Location: Earth (Land portion)
Posts: 1,188
Rep Power: 23 |
Are you using superficial or true velocity porous medium? If superficial then you won't see a difference in pressure drop since it uses the superficial velocity. Use true velocity if you want the volume porosity to make a difference.
Also, look in the documentation, it describes all this much better than I. |
|
February 23, 2015, 12:06 |
|
#3 |
Senior Member
Roland Rakos
Join Date: Mar 2009
Posts: 131
Rep Power: 17 |
OK, thanks a lot!
|
|
February 23, 2015, 12:09 |
|
#4 |
Senior Member
Thomas MADELEINE
Join Date: Oct 2014
Posts: 126
Rep Power: 12 |
If I am right, with superficial porosity the parameter you use are uncoupled...
so the pressure drop only depend on the pressure loss coefficient the velocity depends on the void factor normally be also careful of your mesh since the characteristics are really mesh dependant you have to use the exact same mesh to compare two configurations. |
|
February 23, 2015, 14:07 |
|
#5 | |
Senior Member
Roland Rakos
Join Date: Mar 2009
Posts: 131
Rep Power: 17 |
Quote:
thank for your answer. The mesh is same exactly. I use only one geometry with one mesh. My problem is solved with true velocity but the tuning of the parameters is not too simple. I have a pressure drop measurement in the function of volume rate. I need to have a velocity - pressure drop curve, which seems to be simple: V dot = v*A. But the determination of 'A' is quite complacated because of the complex geometry. If the value A is not correct (consequently the velocity value too) as a result the pressure drop will be too high in porous domain.... |
||
February 6, 2020, 03:14 |
|
#6 |
Member
katty parker
Join Date: May 2018
Posts: 37
Rep Power: 8 |
Hi All,
To study the effect of volume porosity, I created a simple tube with the following boundary conditions and simulation settings: Domain type: Porous (full porous model) Inlet: Opening with specified velocity profile. Outlet: Opening with constant pressure. Loss model: Isotropic loss, velocity type=True velocity, Permeability= 1E-4,1E-8,1E-14(m^2), Resistance loss coeff. = 0(m^-1). Volume porosity: 0.1,0.5,0.9. Why changing the volume porosity do not affect the velocity profile in the solution? |
|
February 6, 2020, 03:56 |
|
#7 |
Super Moderator
Glenn Horrocks
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Sydney, Australia
Posts: 17,854
Rep Power: 144 |
You would have to give more details for us to answer that question. Attach some images of your model, what velocity profile you are talking about and your output file.
__________________
Note: I do not answer CFD questions by PM. CFD questions should be posted on the forum. |
|
February 6, 2020, 11:22 |
|
#8 |
Member
katty parker
Join Date: May 2018
Posts: 37
Rep Power: 8 |
Hi Glenn,
Thanks for the reply. The link below is a brief description of my simulation setup: http://s000.tinyupload.com/?file_id=...24418317362600 And this is the link to the simulation output: http://s000.tinyupload.com/?file_id=...69977472392453 Please let me know if I should provide any further information. |
|
February 6, 2020, 17:56 |
|
#9 |
Super Moderator
Glenn Horrocks
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Sydney, Australia
Posts: 17,854
Rep Power: 144 |
In future please attach the files directly to the post, and put images in your post. This FAQ may help: https://www.cfd-online.com/Wiki/Ansy...n_the_forum.3F
But the answer to your question is obvious - with just an inlet and an outlet the velocity has to go from the inlet to the outlet (it can't go anywhere else!), and all you do when you change the porosity settings is change the pressure loss along the duct. The velocity profile stays the same.
__________________
Note: I do not answer CFD questions by PM. CFD questions should be posted on the forum. |
|
February 7, 2020, 01:56 |
|
#10 |
Member
katty parker
Join Date: May 2018
Posts: 37
Rep Power: 8 |
Thanks for your help.
I didn't know we can upload images to the forum directly. Regarding my problem; Oh, you are right. The inlet is a part of the porous medium too. So what I am doing is actually setting the velocity inside the porous media and there will be no reduction in the cross sectional area of the flow passage. Thanks! |
|
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
sliding mesh problem in CFX | Saima | CFX | 46 | September 11, 2021 08:38 |
How to solve a single volume averaged transport equation of a porous domain | AlemayehuA | CFX | 9 | January 8, 2020 15:22 |
Strange behaviour: Ethanol solution flow on channel with interface to porous domain | khariel | CFX | 6 | December 11, 2014 18:08 |
Multicomponent fluid | Andrea | CFX | 2 | October 11, 2004 06:12 |
help needed about phase change | Yanhu Guo | Main CFD Forum | 4 | January 24, 2001 00:16 |