|
[Sponsors] |
February 18, 2015, 12:29 |
Results are too large
|
#1 |
Member
NC
Join Date: Jan 2015
Posts: 49
Rep Power: 11 |
Being a newbie, I simulated a transient case without optimizing the settings (e.g. too many time steps, every one of which was saved). Consequently the results take up 259 GB of disk space, which I almost ran out. What's the best practice in paring this down without losing anything important? The most straightforward way I can think of is exporting the report after post processing and then deleting the result file, but that doesn't seem ideal. Is there a way I can keep part of the results? Thanks.
|
|
February 18, 2015, 15:37 |
|
#2 |
Senior Member
Edmund Singer P.E.
Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: Minneapolis, MN
Posts: 511
Rep Power: 21 |
Delete the TRN files that you dont need. They represent each time step that was saved, and you can deleted them as you see fit.
|
|
February 19, 2015, 12:15 |
|
#3 |
Member
NC
Join Date: Jan 2015
Posts: 49
Rep Power: 11 |
Many thanks. That wasn't obvious to me.
|
|
Tags |
hard disk space, post procesing |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
OpenFOAM - Validation of Results | Ahmed | OpenFOAM Running, Solving & CFD | 10 | May 13, 2018 19:28 |
Oscillating Airfoil Poor Results at High k (reduced frequency) | dancfd | OpenFOAM Running, Solving & CFD | 3 | November 4, 2013 09:32 |
How to plot a function over a time period? | Cirion0000 | CFX | 4 | July 18, 2009 13:48 |
xy plot help -- large variation in results | alemenchaca | Main CFD Forum | 0 | May 17, 2009 14:45 |
How to present results if a grid is large? | Mich | Main CFD Forum | 3 | April 28, 2009 07:27 |