|
[Sponsors] |
January 9, 2015, 16:52 |
Implementing Singhal cavitation in CFX
|
#1 |
Senior Member
Behrooz Jamshidi
Join Date: Apr 2013
Posts: 110
Rep Power: 13 |
Hi
I have Implemented the Singhal cavitation model with the formulation of Fluent which is a bit different from original one(the formulation is attached).And I dont know what is k in that formulation (some says its turbulent kinetic energy).Any way I have implemented Sauer which is the same as Fluent Sauer, And Zwart model gives same results in both CfD softwares.But Singhal model are completely different. 1- Who knows what is that k in formulation? I read in a paper its pressure relaxation coefficient and no more information 2-Fluent result is like singhal result for naca66(mod) but implemented CFX Singhal is different.The picture is attached 3-How Singhal model consider non condensable gas?Does it solve a transport equation for that? 4-Has anybody experience of successfully implementing Singhal model into CFX? |
|
January 12, 2015, 11:48 |
|
#2 |
Senior Member
Mr CFD
Join Date: Jun 2012
Location: Britain
Posts: 361
Rep Power: 15 |
Rearrange the equation and make k the subject of the formula. Once you've done this what units does it have? Once you know its units then you have a pretty good idea what k is.
See derived SI units for help (although it's pretty easy to determine what units k has). |
|
October 30, 2017, 07:30 |
|
#3 | |
New Member
linlin.geng
Join Date: Oct 2017
Posts: 22
Rep Power: 9 |
Quote:
|
||
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Cavitation Study of a VCO Nozzle in Ansys CFX... | deepakr | CFX | 1 | May 21, 2014 19:46 |
Particle Interaction is CFX; Adding Interparticle Attraction such as Van Der Waals | FrankS | CFX | 11 | November 12, 2013 20:53 |
ATTENTION! Reliability problems in CFX 5.7 | Joseph | CFX | 14 | April 20, 2010 16:45 |
CFX 10's solutions differ from CFX 5.7's | Atit Koonsrisuk | CFX | 4 | July 26, 2006 12:59 |
CFX 4.4 installation problem | Pandu Sattvika | CFX | 1 | December 1, 2001 05:07 |