|
[Sponsors] |
January 4, 2015, 10:09 |
Heat transfer within a porous domain
|
#1 |
New Member
Join Date: Jan 2015
Posts: 6
Rep Power: 11 |
Dear all,
I’m having difficulties in simulating heat transfer within a porous medium in CFX. I tried to set up a simple case of a rectangular channel (600 x 1.5 x 0.3 mm). The top boundary (y = 1.5mm) is modelled as a wall with constant temperature of 80°C, the bottom and side boundaries are symmetry. The mesh has 1 element thickness in the Z-direction (~2D simulation), 15 elements in the Y-direction (biased, so that the region near the top wall has a better resolution) and element length of 0.5 mm in the X-direction. The fluid (water) is entering at x=0 with a static temperature of 25°C. For the outlet boundary (x = 600 mm) I have tried different settings: fixed temperature of 80°C and adiabatic. It seems to be a global convergence issue. I checked the residuals which are more or less spread throughout the whole domain. I reached after 1000 iterations a RMS for H-Energy of the magnitude 1E-2. I also monitored the global imbalance for H-Energy, which gave me the following terms: Boundary: outlet -2.4882E-02 Boundary: wall 1.2982E+01 Domain Src (Neg) : Domain 1 -4.2079E+00 Domain Src (Pos) : Domain 1 4.2251E+00 Domain Imbalance : 1.2974E+01 Domain Imbalance, in %: 99.9405 % Any ideas, as to why the simulation is not converging? In the Ansys help I found an explanation for the term “domain src (neg)” as being the thermal energy that flows between fluid and solid, which makes sense. Why do I get a domain src (pos) term in the same order of magnitude? Why am I not getting a term for the inlet? Might this be related to a limitation of CFX and/or thin slice domain? Thanks for your help and happy new year! Renato |
|
January 4, 2015, 18:04 |
|
#2 |
Super Moderator
Glenn Horrocks
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Sydney, Australia
Posts: 17,854
Rep Power: 144 |
Are you sure it is converged? 1E-2 is very loose convergence and rarely gives useable results. I think you just need to run longer.
|
|
January 7, 2015, 08:25 |
|
#3 |
New Member
Join Date: Jan 2015
Posts: 6
Rep Power: 11 |
Thanks for the reply.
I'm assuming the simulation has not converged. But after about 300 iterations the residuals are not getting any lower, and I ran 1000 iterations, so I don't expect it to be an issue of slow convergence. |
|
January 7, 2015, 10:38 |
|
#4 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Jun 2009
Posts: 1,873
Rep Power: 33 |
what flow boundary conditions are you using for the inlet ? You only described the heat transfer boundary conditions.
Have you tried the case without heat transfer first ? Does it converge ? What timescale are you using for the fluid ? How about the solid timescale ? |
|
January 7, 2015, 18:53 |
|
#5 | |
Super Moderator
Glenn Horrocks
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Sydney, Australia
Posts: 17,854
Rep Power: 144 |
Quote:
|
||
January 9, 2015, 06:06 |
|
#6 |
New Member
Join Date: Jan 2015
Posts: 6
Rep Power: 11 |
Increasing the timescale helped in my case. Thanks for the replies!
|
|
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Water subcooled boiling | Attesz | CFX | 7 | January 5, 2013 04:32 |
Heat transfer thorugh porous | kmgraju | CFX | 3 | December 15, 2012 00:22 |
Convective / Conductive Heat Transfer in Hypersonic flows | enigma | Main CFD Forum | 2 | November 1, 2009 23:53 |
heat transfer in porous domain | Tiago | CFX | 3 | October 19, 2008 02:20 |
REG POROUS MEDIA HEAT TRANSFER | Rashmi Venkat | FLUENT | 6 | June 1, 2006 06:13 |