|
[Sponsors] |
having trouble implementing airfoil with Wall Slip condition |
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Search this Thread | Display Modes |
December 21, 2014, 07:44 |
having trouble implementing airfoil with Wall Slip condition
|
#1 |
New Member
Mohammad Hossein Khozaei
Join Date: Nov 2011
Posts: 8
Rep Power: 15 |
Hello every body
I need to solve my problem on airfoil with wall Slip condition. as i found, i can put this condition in 2 ways: 1. enter a wall velocity 2. enter specified shear on the wall In both the ways i need to enter velocity or specified shear with 2 components (x & y). The problem is, as the normal-vector of the wall is changing around the airfoil and the wall-velocity (and specified shear) are both tangential to the wall, I need to have a local-coordinate-system in each point of the airfoil-wall to enter the velocity due to the local-coordinate-systems. (or something like this) (I don't have the Airfoil-wall-equation) (I have to check the results in different slip lengths, 10% slip to 50%, not 100% or free slip) (and then it must be solved in a complicated 3-D geometry, so i can't split the wall into some semi-linear parts.) I don't know how to do this and whether it works or not. can any body help me ? please. I really appreciate it. PS. In easy words, 10% slip means velocity on the wall is 10% of free-stream (tangential to the wall) (wall-slip-condition can be defined by 3 (related) parameters: 1. specified shear 2. wall-velocity 3. slip length, the definitions are available in literature, but in CFX and Fluent i just can enter specified shear or wall velocity, you can find them in wall-boundary-detail under cover of mass and momentum) (to avoid mathematical equation it's better to define a wall velocity than specified shear) Last edited by Khozaei4000; December 22, 2014 at 02:00. Reason: Make it more complete. |
|
December 21, 2014, 17:07 |
|
#2 |
Super Moderator
Glenn Horrocks
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Sydney, Australia
Posts: 17,871
Rep Power: 144 |
Or:
3. Go to the Boundary details tab and select Mass and momentum option: "Free slip wall". I think I would choose option 3. |
|
December 22, 2014, 00:59 |
|
#3 |
New Member
Mohammad Hossein Khozaei
Join Date: Nov 2011
Posts: 8
Rep Power: 15 |
||
December 22, 2014, 01:32 |
|
#4 |
Super Moderator
Glenn Horrocks
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Sydney, Australia
Posts: 17,871
Rep Power: 144 |
So why didn't you say that you want 10%-50% slip in the first post?
Can you define mathematically want you want to do? In other words, if you want 10% slip, what actually is 10% slip defined as? And why do you want to use this model? |
|
December 22, 2014, 01:49 |
|
#5 | |
New Member
Mohammad Hossein Khozaei
Join Date: Nov 2011
Posts: 8
Rep Power: 15 |
Quote:
I have to find influence of different percentage of wall-slip on Drag 'n Lift forces, velocity 'n pressure fields, etc. and the influence on some other parameters in complicated 3D model. that's it. |
||
December 22, 2014, 05:59 |
|
#6 |
Super Moderator
Glenn Horrocks
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Sydney, Australia
Posts: 17,871
Rep Power: 144 |
You probably know the free stream velocity as you defined your inlet and outlet boundary conditions to have a defined free stream condition. Therefore you know the velocity to apply at the wall. You can make sure it is tangential to the wall using the normal_x, normal_y and normal_z variables.
|
|
December 22, 2014, 06:46 |
|
#7 | |
New Member
Mohammad Hossein Khozaei
Join Date: Nov 2011
Posts: 8
Rep Power: 15 |
Quote:
how can i obtain normal_x, normal_y and normal_y variables? is there a CEL? can i write an expression for them ? |
||
December 22, 2014, 06:54 |
|
#8 |
Super Moderator
Glenn Horrocks
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Sydney, Australia
Posts: 17,871
Rep Power: 144 |
That should be the variable names. It should work in CEL expressions. It exists on wall boundary patches.
|
|
December 22, 2014, 07:12 |
|
#9 |
New Member
Mohammad Hossein Khozaei
Join Date: Nov 2011
Posts: 8
Rep Power: 15 |
||
December 22, 2014, 07:15 |
|
#10 |
Super Moderator
Glenn Horrocks
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Sydney, Australia
Posts: 17,871
Rep Power: 144 |
CFX-Pre does not have all variables in it. The solver has all the variables. So stick them in CFX-Pre, ignore the warning/error about variable names and see if the solver accepts them.
|
|
December 22, 2014, 07:21 |
|
#11 |
New Member
Mohammad Hossein Khozaei
Join Date: Nov 2011
Posts: 8
Rep Power: 15 |
||
Tags |
wall slip condition |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Problem with airfoil shape optimization | robyTKD | SU2 Shape Design | 7 | March 7, 2022 17:18 |
Divergence in AMG solver! | marina | FLUENT | 20 | August 1, 2020 12:30 |
Partial slip Johnson-Jackson wall boundary condition OF 2.3.0 | mwaqas | OpenFOAM Running, Solving & CFD | 5 | December 4, 2014 19:44 |
how to set up a wall boundary condition according to calculated wall shear stress? | gameoverli | OpenFOAM Pre-Processing | 1 | May 21, 2009 09:28 |
How to write udf of slip wall condition | cxzhao | FLUENT | 0 | April 27, 2005 22:20 |