|
[Sponsors] |
Montecarlo CFX: Coarsening ratio VS Number of Histories |
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Search this Thread | Display Modes |
December 10, 2014, 07:36 |
Montecarlo CFX: Coarsening ratio VS Number of Histories
|
#1 |
Member
Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: Pisa / Italy
Posts: 62
Rep Power: 16 |
Hi all,
I have a question, just a curiosity of mine. In your opinion is it quicker ( in terms of CPU time ) to have a lot of histories keeping the coarsening ratio high (std is 64) or to have lower coarseing ratio ( let's say under 8 for example ) and a lower number of histories? I think the real question could be : is the number of histories associated to the number of radiating element or to the domain? Thanks for your opinions |
|
Tags |
cfx, montecarlo, radiation model |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
AMI speed performance | danny123 | OpenFOAM | 21 | October 24, 2020 05:13 |
ERROR #001100279 has occurred in subroutine ErrAction. | smnaryal | CFX | 11 | December 20, 2017 17:32 |
[mesh manipulation] Mesh Refinement | Luiz Eduardo Bittencourt Sampaio (Sampaio) | OpenFOAM Meshing & Mesh Conversion | 42 | January 8, 2017 13:55 |
[blockMesh] --> foam fatal error: | lillo763 | OpenFOAM Meshing & Mesh Conversion | 0 | March 5, 2014 11:27 |
Unaligned accesses on IA64 | andre | OpenFOAM | 5 | June 23, 2008 11:37 |