CFD Online Logo CFD Online URL
www.cfd-online.com
[Sponsors]
Home > Forums > Software User Forums > ANSYS > CFX

The problem of setting the boundary condition

Register Blogs Community New Posts Updated Threads Search

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
Old   December 7, 2014, 07:01
Default The problem of setting the boundary condition
  #1
New Member
 
Hao
Join Date: Dec 2014
Location: Beijing, China
Posts: 6
Rep Power: 12
Nateqian is on a distinguished road
Hello everyone, I have a question about the boundary condition. There is a transient analysis about damping pressure pulsation. The model I analysis is a tube which is expanding in the middle of the tube. The inlet boundary I set is a sine function of pressure. And the outlet boundary I set is still a constant pressure. I want to solve the outlet pressure that to know the rate of pressure decay. I want to ask the outlet boundary I set is right or not. I have attached a file of my model. My English is poor, I don't know what I said is clear or not. Thank you for helping me.
Attached Images
File Type: jpg IMG_1208.jpg (16.5 KB, 27 views)
Nateqian is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   December 7, 2014, 17:29
Default
  #2
Super Moderator
 
Glenn Horrocks
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Sydney, Australia
Posts: 17,870
Rep Power: 144
ghorrocks is just really niceghorrocks is just really niceghorrocks is just really niceghorrocks is just really nice
You cannot tell whether your boundary conditions are correct based on what you have said. The boundary conditions are correctly applied if the accurately model the situation in the real system at that point. In the real system what is at your inlet and outlet points?
ghorrocks is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   December 8, 2014, 21:39
Default
  #3
New Member
 
Hao
Join Date: Dec 2014
Location: Beijing, China
Posts: 6
Rep Power: 12
Nateqian is on a distinguished road
Quote:
Originally Posted by ghorrocks View Post
You cannot tell whether your boundary conditions are correct based on what you have said. The boundary conditions are correctly applied if the accurately model the situation in the real system at that point. In the real system what is at your inlet and outlet points?
Thank you for your reply. The model I analyzed is a part of the hydraulic system. The upstream of the model is the pump which the inlet connected to. And the downstream of the model is hydraulic tube. The result I want to get is the attenuation of the pressure pulsation. Now I set the inlet boundary for total pressure: 11±1 MPa, and the outlet boundary for static pressure: 11 MPa. During the analysis, I monitor the pressure of the outlet. Then calculate the attenuation by comparing the monitor value with the inlet pressure pulsation.
But I don't know whether the pressure boundary of the outlet can affect the monitor or not. And if the setting is right, I want to know where the monitor point to set up is reasonable.
Waiting for your reply. Thank you very much.
Nateqian is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   December 9, 2014, 04:35
Default
  #4
Super Moderator
 
Glenn Horrocks
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Sydney, Australia
Posts: 17,870
Rep Power: 144
ghorrocks is just really niceghorrocks is just really niceghorrocks is just really niceghorrocks is just really nice
You are using an outlet boundary where you define the pressure and you are using the outlet pressure as the output result. Can you see the problem with this configuration?

Are you doing a compressible flow model? If not why not? Is the geometry deformable? Where does the attenuation come from? Is it just the flow losses?

You need to do a lot of thinking before proceeding with this simulation. In particular:
* You need to consider whether your boundary conditions reflect pressure waves and will ruin your results.
* You need to think about an output result which actually measures something useful.
* This model requires careful validation as it is also a transient model.
ghorrocks is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   December 10, 2014, 21:53
Default
  #5
New Member
 
Hao
Join Date: Dec 2014
Location: Beijing, China
Posts: 6
Rep Power: 12
Nateqian is on a distinguished road
Quote:
Originally Posted by ghorrocks View Post
You are using an outlet boundary where you define the pressure and you are using the outlet pressure as the output result. Can you see the problem with this configuration?

Are you doing a compressible flow model? If not why not? Is the geometry deformable? Where does the attenuation come from? Is it just the flow losses?

You need to do a lot of thinking before proceeding with this simulation. In particular:
* You need to consider whether your boundary conditions reflect pressure waves and will ruin your results.
* You need to think about an output result which actually measures something useful.
* This model requires careful validation as it is also a transient model.
Thank you very much. It's really a big help for me. The model's function like the muffler of the car. Now it also used in the hydraulic system. The material of the model is hydraulic oil, so it can be regarded as incompressible. And the the geometry is non deformable. During the analysis, the flow losses can be ignored.
Now I will take your advice to have a careful deliberation.
Can I extend the outlet tube to avoid the interference of the outlet boundary's reflection. Or is there other usefull measure to avoid this?
I know my question may be annoying. I hope you can still give me some advices. Thank you very much. Best wishes!
Nateqian is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   December 11, 2014, 00:30
Default
  #6
Super Moderator
 
Glenn Horrocks
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Sydney, Australia
Posts: 17,870
Rep Power: 144
ghorrocks is just really niceghorrocks is just really niceghorrocks is just really niceghorrocks is just really nice
Your question is not annoying - the forum is here to help people and if it is helping you then everything is good.

The muffler in a car works by using the compressibility of the exhaust gases to absorb some frequencies. You need some form of compliance to reduce the wave. That compliance could come from compressibility of a fluid, movement of the structure or other actions.
ghorrocks is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   December 22, 2014, 21:46
Default
  #7
New Member
 
Hao
Join Date: Dec 2014
Location: Beijing, China
Posts: 6
Rep Power: 12
Nateqian is on a distinguished road
Quote:
Originally Posted by ghorrocks View Post
Your question is not annoying - the forum is here to help people and if it is helping you then everything is good.

The muffler in a car works by using the compressibility of the exhaust gases to absorb some frequencies. You need some form of compliance to reduce the wave. That compliance could come from compressibility of a fluid, movement of the structure or other actions.
Sorry for my late reply. Thank you very much for your detailed reply. I will consider this problem carefully.
Nateqian is offline   Reply With Quote

Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
inlet velocity boundary condition murali CFX 5 August 3, 2012 09:56
Boundary condition setting regarding turbine simulation using CFX Lacerlacer CFX 11 March 12, 2012 10:32
Setting outlet Pressure boundary condition using CAFFA code Mukund Pondkule Main CFD Forum 0 March 16, 2011 04:23
Convective Heat Transfer - Heat Exchanger Mark CFX 6 November 15, 2004 16:55
Periodic flow boundary condition problem sudha FLUENT 3 April 28, 2004 09:40


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 14:47.