|
[Sponsors] |
October 1, 2014, 19:25 |
Viscoelastic Model
|
#1 |
New Member
Josiah Lund
Join Date: Sep 2014
Location: Norman, OK, USA
Posts: 7
Rep Power: 12 |
I am working on a simulation that I would like to use viscoelastic properties for. I have simulation data from the model before applying the viscoelastic properties and also for after. After applying, the model is failing due to a negative element. The part that is confusing me is that the negative element is being seen long before my pressure wave reaches the viscoelastic material. I have attached images of the two pressure plots, which show a pressure reading that to me, is unexplained.
The only difference between the two simulation is the addition of a Prony Shear Relaxation property. Values for the table are as follows: Temperature = 27 [C] Relative Moduli(i) = 5.5556 Relaxation Time(i) = 2.5e-5 [s] These values were chosen based on the information found on page 6 of the following document http://ansys.net/ansys/papers/nonlin...ng_viscoel.pdf I have also linked this page to a previous issue that is still unsolved with this model. I would like to resolve both issues, but achieving a successful viscoelastic simulation is my priority http://www.cfd-online.com/Forums/cfx...tructural.html |
|
October 5, 2014, 08:32 |
|
#2 |
Super Moderator
Glenn Horrocks
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Sydney, Australia
Posts: 17,870
Rep Power: 144 |
Have you checked your convergence when it crashes? I bet the solver is going bezerk.
|
|
October 9, 2014, 13:33 |
|
#3 |
New Member
Josiah Lund
Join Date: Sep 2014
Location: Norman, OK, USA
Posts: 7
Rep Power: 12 |
Glenn,
I do not know how to check the convergence when the simulation crashes. I tried running two separate simulations using low and high convergence criteria and the results are different from one another, but surprisingly, the one with worse convergence criteria ran longer. I have included images of these two runs. Is there any reason as to why the higher convergence model would crash earlier? |
|
October 9, 2014, 19:07 |
|
#4 |
Super Moderator
Glenn Horrocks
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Sydney, Australia
Posts: 17,870
Rep Power: 144 |
This sounds like your model is highly numerically unstable so anything can happen. I would not read too much into how quickly things crash other than you need to improve numerical stability.
You can do that by: * Smaller time steps * Double precision numerics * Better mesh quality (this one is the usual problem, you can always do a better mesh) * better initial condition |
|
Tags |
negative elements, negative volume, negative volume element, viscoelastic |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Is it possible to model natural convection in a 2D horizontal model in fluent | caitoc | FLUENT | 1 | May 5, 2014 14:32 |
Error finding variable "THERMX" | sunilpatil | CFX | 8 | April 26, 2013 08:00 |
2 stage axial turbine model convergence issues | sherifkadry | CFX | 2 | September 7, 2009 21:51 |
multi fluid mixture model issue | rystokes | CFX | 3 | August 9, 2009 20:13 |
Advanced Turbulence Modeling in Fluent, Realizable k-epsilon Model | Jonas Larsson | FLUENT | 5 | March 13, 2000 04:27 |