CFD Online Logo CFD Online URL
www.cfd-online.com
[Sponsors]
Home > Forums > Software User Forums > ANSYS > CFX

Conjugate heat transfer mesh requirements (picture attached)

Register Blogs Community New Posts Updated Threads Search

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
Old   August 21, 2014, 08:51
Default Conjugate heat transfer mesh requirements (picture attached)
  #1
Senior Member
 
JuPa's Avatar
 
Mr CFD
Join Date: Jun 2012
Location: Britain
Posts: 361
Rep Power: 15
JuPa is on a distinguished road
In conjugate heat transfer problems we're solving the energy equation in a solid domain, which may be in contact with a fluid domain where we solve all of the conservation equations.

In the solid part, since all we're doing is simulating the diffusion of heat through the solid I assume the the mesh requirements for the solid part does not have to be amazing (but still adhere to orthogonality and skewness requirements). Is this a valid assumption?

Which leads me to my main question:

At the solid - fluid interface (see attached) can I have a sudden jump in cell size from the solid (grey) to the fluid (blue) domains?

Please note I have not finished the final mesh - I will have more cells in the solid (grey) domain to capture the temperature gradients.

Thank you.
Attached Images
File Type: jpg Mesh.jpg (53.4 KB, 79 views)
JuPa is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   August 21, 2014, 19:28
Default
  #2
Super Moderator
 
Glenn Horrocks
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Sydney, Australia
Posts: 17,871
Rep Power: 144
ghorrocks is just really niceghorrocks is just really niceghorrocks is just really niceghorrocks is just really nice
Steady state heat flow is just diffusion, so is linear. In that case a very coarse mesh can resolve this OK. You might be OK with just a single element thick - but I would check on an analytical case first before committing to it.

But for transient heat transfer, the transient bit can put additional thermal gradients into the material. Whether this is important to you or not is dependent on how fast the transients are and how accurately you need to resolve them.
ghorrocks is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   August 21, 2014, 19:33
Default
  #3
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Posts: 1,880
Rep Power: 33
Opaque will become famous soon enough
Keep in mind that diffusion solution is linear only if there is no curvature of the isotherms. For example, steady state one dimensional radial diffusion has a logarithmic profile between inner and outer radius. The isotherms may be packed near the boundaries depending of the radii ratio in that case.
Opaque is offline   Reply With Quote

Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Two-sided Wall Heat Transfer BC - No Separate Solid Mesh and No Heat Transfer Coeff swahono OpenFOAM Running, Solving & CFD 10 October 15, 2018 06:43
conjugate heat transfer in OpenFOAM skuznet OpenFOAM Running, Solving & CFD 99 March 16, 2017 06:07
Moving mesh Niklas Wikstrom (Wikstrom) OpenFOAM Running, Solving & CFD 122 June 15, 2014 07:20
Conjugate heat transfer kiteguru CFX 2 January 9, 2012 16:57
Conjugate Heat Transfer boathead STAR-CCM+ 1 April 15, 2011 10:13


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 11:41.