|
[Sponsors] |
June 5, 2014, 17:13 |
Separating Interfaces in CFX
|
#1 |
New Member
Alex
Join Date: Jun 2014
Location: Canada
Posts: 15
Rep Power: 12 |
In my problem, I have a solid (heat sink) sitting on top of another solid (housing) and I have enclosed them both in a fluid domain since I am running a conjugate heat transfer analysis.
My issue is that when I'm trying to define the interface between the two solids, I cannot simple select where they are in contact, but rather only the entire face. The top face of the housing is in contact partially with the heat sink and partially with the surrounding fluid, but I can't define both or the interfaces will overlap. This may seem like a simple problem, but I'm having a difficult time finding a solution online and it's messing up my solution. Any ideas? Thanks in advance |
|
June 5, 2014, 21:03 |
|
#2 |
Super Moderator
Glenn Horrocks
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Sydney, Australia
Posts: 17,854
Rep Power: 144 |
A boundary face cannot be shared between two interfaces. You are going to have to break the surface up.
|
|
June 5, 2014, 22:22 |
|
#3 |
New Member
Alex
Join Date: Jun 2014
Location: Canada
Posts: 15
Rep Power: 12 |
Thanks for the quick response Glenn. I kind of figured as much, so that's what I've been trying to figure out how to do (I'm new to CFD). At what stage in the pre-processing can this be done and how would I go about doing it?
|
|
June 5, 2014, 22:55 |
|
#4 |
Super Moderator
Glenn Horrocks
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Sydney, Australia
Posts: 17,854
Rep Power: 144 |
The best way is to go to the solid model and split the face. Then mesh with both faces given a different name, and then use the different faces in different interfaces in CFX-Pre.
|
|
June 6, 2014, 13:56 |
|
#5 |
New Member
Alex
Join Date: Jun 2014
Location: Canada
Posts: 15
Rep Power: 12 |
Perfect. I went back into SolidWorks (where I imported the geometry from), split the faces, and now they can be easily selected in CFX-Pre. The only other problem that I am still having with my model is related to the heat generation boundary condition. My goal is to impose a heat flux on two faces of the model and then see how this heat is dissipated through the solid and out into the fluid. When I run the solution with this imposed heat flux though, I get unrealistically high temperature values and I don't know why.
I'm confident that all the other boundary conditions are correct because when I run the same analysis with a fixed temperature instead of a heat flux, the results make sense. If the faces in question are in contact with the fluid, do I apply the heat flux to both the solid and fluid domains on that face? The heat flux is approximately 69 000 W/m^2, which I calculated from the area of the faces and the desired heat power (112.5 W per face). Any help/guidance would be appreciated. |
|
June 9, 2014, 20:04 |
|
#6 |
Super Moderator
Glenn Horrocks
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Sydney, Australia
Posts: 17,854
Rep Power: 144 |
Have you done the normal accuracy checks: http://www.cfd-online.com/Wiki/Ansys..._inaccurate.3F
|
|
June 10, 2014, 16:32 |
|
#7 |
New Member
Alex
Join Date: Jun 2014
Location: Canada
Posts: 15
Rep Power: 12 |
I just ended up using a fixed temperature, as it provided an adequate solution to my problem. That being said, I will take a look at that link in case I run into this problem in the future. Thanks again for your help.
|
|
January 28, 2016, 11:03 |
|
#8 | |
Member
Marcel Jay
Join Date: Jun 2014
Location: Berlin
Posts: 52
Rep Power: 12 |
Quote:
I have bodies with faces that are in contact with two other solids and one fluid. I was using the Named Selections based on the Auto Connections, which makes it even worse as multiple faces are grouped. As my model consists of ~80 interfaces and the maybe more than 200 faces which would needed to be split up, doing this manually can't be the solution. Cheers Marcel |
||
January 28, 2016, 17:21 |
|
#9 |
Super Moderator
Glenn Horrocks
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Sydney, Australia
Posts: 17,854
Rep Power: 144 |
Try the geometry and meshing forum.
|
|
Tags |
ansys, cfx, conjugate heat transfer, interface |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
CFX Treatment of Laminar and Turbulent Flows | Jade M | CFX | 18 | September 15, 2022 08:08 |
High Resolution (CFX) vs 2nd Order Upwind (Fluent) | gravis | ANSYS | 3 | March 24, 2011 03:43 |
CFX pressure in Simulations problem | nasdak | CFX | 1 | April 14, 2010 14:22 |
Different flow pattern between OpenFOAM and CFX | AirS | OpenFOAM | 0 | January 12, 2010 08:08 |
CFX 10's solutions differ from CFX 5.7's | Atit Koonsrisuk | CFX | 4 | July 26, 2006 12:59 |