|
[Sponsors] |
Increase the size of the domain each time step |
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Search this Thread | Display Modes |
March 11, 2014, 22:53 |
Increase the size of the domain each time step
|
#1 |
New Member
Ivan
Join Date: Mar 2014
Posts: 11
Rep Power: 12 |
Hi every body. Is it possible in cfx increase the size of the domain each time step. For example if i have 1 x 1 domain at t=0 then have 1 x 2 domain at t=1 and so on. Its not like deforming it but like adding grids. Any ideas guys?
|
|
March 12, 2014, 05:03 |
|
#2 |
Super Moderator
Glenn Horrocks
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Sydney, Australia
Posts: 17,854
Rep Power: 144 |
You can use dynamic remeshing to add more mesh.
Alternately you can do an initial simulation, then stop. The start a new simulation with the 2x1 mesh and interpolate the first run results onto the second as an initial condition. This much simpler, and can be scripted to run automatically if you want. It is of course a bit limiting in what it can do. Another alternative as you say is to use moving mesh. Which option is best will depend on exactly what you are trying to do. |
|
March 12, 2014, 09:19 |
|
#3 |
Senior Member
Edmund Singer P.E.
Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: Minneapolis, MN
Posts: 511
Rep Power: 21 |
Or if it is really just discreet addition, you can put in all of the additional mesh in, connected by GGI, and have conditional GGI interfaces close versus time.
No remeshing, or anything needed. |
|
March 12, 2014, 22:35 |
thanks for your replies
|
#4 |
New Member
Ivan
Join Date: Mar 2014
Posts: 11
Rep Power: 12 |
thanks guys for your replies:
I am trying to simulate the oil well drilling process. So in few words its an annular space with inlet and outlet (multi phase flow; drilling mud fluid and solid cuttings from the drillbit). In Unsteady state the drill bit (inlet) advance into the formation so the pipe (annular space) increase its length with time. So i tried mesh deformation but when the inlet advance it deforms, and i don't want that, i just want to change its position adding meshes :S |
|
March 12, 2014, 23:01 |
|
#5 |
Super Moderator
Glenn Horrocks
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Sydney, Australia
Posts: 17,854
Rep Power: 144 |
Don't forget you can model this in the absolute frame of reference (ie a stationary earth and the drill bit advances) or in the drill bit frame of reference (ie the earth moves past a stationary drill bit). If there are no accelerations then these two frames of reference are equivalent.
I would have thought modelling the drill bit as stationary would mean you do not need to add mesh. |
|
March 13, 2014, 15:24 |
thanks
|
#6 |
New Member
Ivan
Join Date: Mar 2014
Posts: 11
Rep Power: 12 |
in fact, the acceleration is neglected because the rate of penetration of the drill bit is so small like 50 - 100 ft/hr, but since I m modeling the cuttings bed (sedimentation of the solid cuttings at bottom of the well) and the propagation of it in the length of the well as a function of time I want to consider the length that adds to the initial length as the drill process exist in the time.
So, if I want to move the inlet (drill bit) each time step how can I do it guys? im really lost in this case, cuz I got move the inlet as I want (at a rate of penetration on the formation) but it move part of the inlet, and part of the wall ( of the annular space that shares with the inlet) doesn't move so the inlet deforms and the vectors of the flow at inlet moves. |
|
March 13, 2014, 17:32 |
|
#7 | |
Super Moderator
Glenn Horrocks
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Sydney, Australia
Posts: 17,854
Rep Power: 144 |
Quote:
Advancing the drill is a simple application of moving mesh. After a while you will need either a dynamic remesh or a stop/restart to a new mesh when the old mesh is too stretched. But why model this transient? If the rate of advancement is small then why not model this as a series of steady state simulations? It sounds like you can decouple the advance velocity to the fluid flow and that greatly simplifies the simulation. |
||
Tags |
cfx & fluent, mesh |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
High Courant Number @ icoFoam | Artex85 | OpenFOAM Running, Solving & CFD | 11 | February 16, 2017 14:40 |
Micro Scale Pore, icoFoam | gooya_kabir | OpenFOAM Running, Solving & CFD | 2 | November 2, 2013 14:58 |
AMI interDyMFoam for mixer nu problem | danny123 | OpenFOAM Programming & Development | 8 | September 6, 2013 03:34 |
How to write k and epsilon before the abnormal end | xiuying | OpenFOAM Running, Solving & CFD | 8 | August 27, 2013 16:33 |
IcoFoam parallel woes | msrinath80 | OpenFOAM Running, Solving & CFD | 9 | July 22, 2007 03:58 |