|
[Sponsors] |
September 20, 2013, 06:47 |
Particle tracking problem with MRF
|
#1 |
Member
Jianye Xia
Join Date: Mar 2009
Posts: 32
Rep Power: 18 |
Hi all,
I have encountered the problem with particle tracking in a stirred tank simulation with the Multiple Reference Frame method, the setting of my model is like this: Firstly, I use Freeze/Roter (MRF) to get the initial steady state velocity field in the stirred tank reactor, Then, freeze the velocity field and inject the particles at one small boundary (inlet of the stirred tank), one way coupling (particles have no effect on the velcoity of liquid) of these particles was used, I aslo active the expert parameter of 'pt tracks in absolute frame', but the resulted trajectories of each particle showed that it discontinued at the interface between non-rotating zone and rotating zone. Has any body met with this probem of particle tracking with MRF? Any comments and suggestions is appreciated! Jianye |
|
September 20, 2013, 07:17 |
|
#2 |
Super Moderator
Glenn Horrocks
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Sydney, Australia
Posts: 17,870
Rep Power: 144 |
||
September 20, 2013, 07:53 |
|
#3 |
Member
Jianye Xia
Join Date: Mar 2009
Posts: 32
Rep Power: 18 |
Thanks, Glenn!
I red that, but my problem is not the streamline but particle trajectory. The trajectory disconnected across the station/rotating interface. Jianye |
|
September 20, 2013, 08:48 |
|
#4 |
Super Moderator
Glenn Horrocks
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Sydney, Australia
Posts: 17,870
Rep Power: 144 |
Streamline or particle track, the effect is the same. The change in reference frame means tracks do not appear continuous.
|
|
September 20, 2013, 09:22 |
|
#5 | |
Member
Jianye Xia
Join Date: Mar 2009
Posts: 32
Rep Power: 18 |
Glenn, can you make it more clear?
Quote:
When I process the particle trakcing results, there is "Res PT for Particle" in the model tree, when I double clicked it, there was no options for selecting "Velocity in stn frame" in the setting panel of "Res PT for Particle". I have toggle on the expert parameter of "'pt tracks in absolute frame'", that should be mean that the particle will follow the velocity in stationary fram, am I right? And what does it mean by "To see continuous streamlines plot the variable "Velocity in stationary frame". "? How did you do that? can you provide more details ? Thanks a lot! |
||
September 20, 2013, 09:27 |
|
#6 |
Super Moderator
Glenn Horrocks
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Sydney, Australia
Posts: 17,870
Rep Power: 144 |
The FAQ is referring to CFD-Post.
I am not aware of the "pt tracks in absolute frame" expert parameter but I presume it does what it says it does and those tracks should be continuous. Plotting the variable "Velocity in stationary frame" is relevant to streamlines only. This option is not available for particle tracks. |
|
September 20, 2013, 09:40 |
It is sure not continuous
|
#7 |
Member
Jianye Xia
Join Date: Mar 2009
Posts: 32
Rep Power: 18 |
See attached figure: the red arrow point the disconnectied trajectories
|
|
September 21, 2013, 07:18 |
|
#8 |
Super Moderator
Glenn Horrocks
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Sydney, Australia
Posts: 17,870
Rep Power: 144 |
I am not sure what is happening there. Have you checked your particle termination parameters?
|
|
September 22, 2013, 17:13 |
|
#9 |
Member
Jianye Xia
Join Date: Mar 2009
Posts: 32
Rep Power: 18 |
I have also checked with the termination parameters, but it did also not work!
Any other clues? |
|
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Ubuntu 12.10 + openfoam2.2.0 ==> paraview error message | peteryuan | OpenFOAM Installation | 6 | August 18, 2013 19:00 |
problem the kagrangian particle tracking | hamidciv | CFX | 1 | April 5, 2013 06:12 |
Particle tracking - Domain interface / FrozenRotor | mohanrao | CFX | 4 | January 23, 2008 04:39 |
restarting lagrange (particle tracking) simulation | dbdias | CFX | 0 | September 22, 2007 20:26 |
continuous particle tracking | desperate | FLUENT | 0 | June 22, 2007 13:35 |