|
[Sponsors] |
help me to set suitable outlet boundary condition |
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Search this Thread | Display Modes |
July 12, 2013, 22:51 |
help me to set suitable outlet boundary condition
|
#1 |
Senior Member
Shashwat
Join Date: Nov 2011
Posts: 107
Rep Power: 15 |
Hi
I am simulating blood flow through multiple stenosis condition. ( currently I set two serial stenosis separated few mm apart) I know the inlet velocity and time averaged pressure which I have taken from journal. The inlet velocity u(t)= Uave+Uave*sin(4*pi*f*t-(pi/2)) measured Time average pressure proximal to the stenosis is 89 mm Hg I have only these data. If I set inlet velocity u(t) at the inlet ,what is the boundary conditions at the outlet . what is the suitable initial condition for the transient flow analysis?. (I am very concern about pressure drop at each stenosis). Thank you Shashwat |
|
July 13, 2013, 08:27 |
|
#2 |
Super Moderator
Glenn Horrocks
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Sydney, Australia
Posts: 17,870
Rep Power: 144 |
If you do not know the conditions at the exit boundary then you cannot perform a simulation. You MUST know the conditions at the exit to perform a simulation. So if you do not know the conditions there you must move the exit boundayr to somewhere you do know them.
|
|
July 13, 2013, 12:47 |
|
#3 | |
Senior Member
Shashwat
Join Date: Nov 2011
Posts: 107
Rep Power: 15 |
Quote:
my professor told that put "out flow boundary condition" But I have read in one of the articles "stress free boundary condition" applied at the outlet. [A stress free boundary condition was specified at the outlet. Adequate distal length was ensured for accurate determination of pressure drops due to the lesion and for the convergence of the calculations-Guidewire flow obstruction effect on pressure drop-flow relationship in moderate coronary artery stenosis] I have confused with the outlet boundary condition. what is outflow and stress free conditions? Please help me to put suitable boundary conditions |
||
July 13, 2013, 19:42 |
|
#4 |
Super Moderator
Glenn Horrocks
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Sydney, Australia
Posts: 17,870
Rep Power: 144 |
If you only want to know the pressure drop (and the flow is incompressible) then pressure is relative. This means you can specify any pressure you like so it might as well be zero.
There are many different types of outflow conditions. You can use specified pressure with convective conditions for other variables (this is what CFX uses), some people use zero normal gradient and some people use other conditions (eg stress free). In the end they tend to be very similar and rarely make any significant difference to results. |
|
July 14, 2013, 23:23 |
|
#5 |
Senior Member
Shashwat
Join Date: Nov 2011
Posts: 107
Rep Power: 15 |
Thank you for your reply
Please find the attached cross sectional view of artery.The artery length is 100mm I have considered two cases 1.Rigid artery ( wall has no permeable) 2. wall having permeable ( Porous domain) I have confused with setting boundary conditions in the case 2 ( porous domain). I set fluid - porous interface by using GCI. I set other portions as wall and no slip condition was executed. is it correct? I also tried free slip boundary conditions, but solver return with error immediately your advice is important to proceed further Thank you |
|
July 14, 2013, 23:53 |
|
#6 |
Super Moderator
Glenn Horrocks
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Sydney, Australia
Posts: 17,870
Rep Power: 144 |
Can you successfully run simulations with no FSI or mesh motion? Simplify your simulation down to what does run, then add the complexity one bit at a time - checking it works every time you add something new.
|
|
July 15, 2013, 00:38 |
|
#7 | |
Senior Member
Shashwat
Join Date: Nov 2011
Posts: 107
Rep Power: 15 |
Quote:
I set now outlet boundary as areaAve(Pressure)@outlet what does it mean? Is it relative pressure of the outlet from the inlet pressure? If it is correct no need to put any value of pressure at the outlet. Am I correct? Please clarify next, "Before applying the transient pressure and flow, The models were axially stretched by 10% of the initial length and pressurized to a mean physiologic pressure of 89.04 mmHg to account for residual stresses".The above statement I have taken from one of the journals . I need your help to understand this statement in cfx point of view. Thank you Thank you so much Last edited by shaswat; July 15, 2013 at 20:03. |
||
July 15, 2013, 21:29 |
|
#8 |
Super Moderator
Glenn Horrocks
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Sydney, Australia
Posts: 17,870
Rep Power: 144 |
Why have you set the outlet pressure to be the average of the outlet pressure? This sounds wrong to me - you should set it to the known fixed outlet pressure value (probably 0Pa).
|
|
July 16, 2013, 06:33 |
|
#9 | |
Senior Member
Shashwat
Join Date: Nov 2011
Posts: 107
Rep Power: 15 |
Quote:
Thank you for your reply Dear Dr Ghorrocks I introdce transient velocity at the inlet and I introduce the outlet boundary condition ( may be wrong) as shown below BOUNDARY: out Boundary Type = WALL Location = F43.41 BOUNDARY CONDITIONS: MASS AND MOMENTUM: Option = Specified Shear SHEAR STRESS: Option = Cartesian Components xValue = 0 [Pa] yValue = 0 [Pa] zValue = 0 [Pa] END Kindly give your comments on it. what is wrong? or which condition shall I use this? Thank you |
||
July 16, 2013, 19:53 |
|
#10 |
Super Moderator
Glenn Horrocks
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Sydney, Australia
Posts: 17,870
Rep Power: 144 |
You are using a wall as your outlet boundary !!?? This is obviously a bad idea.
|
|
July 17, 2013, 03:54 |
|
#11 | |
Senior Member
Shashwat
Join Date: Nov 2011
Posts: 107
Rep Power: 15 |
Quote:
Kindly refer the attachment diagram . I am really really struggle to set inlet and outlet of the porous domain. Since the fluid is flowing through the luman ( fluid domain), I am struggling to set the boundary condition at the inlet and outlet of the porous domain ( artery wall) I assume that the flow will come down when it is flow along the porous wall. I activated buoyant flow in the y direction ( flow is in the Z direction) Is it necessary to activate buoyant flow? I set inlet velocity =0 m/s and outlet= 0 pa for the porous domain. Please help me to put suitable boundary conditions on the porous domain Thank you Last edited by shaswat; July 17, 2013 at 05:10. |
||
July 17, 2013, 04:00 |
|
#12 |
Super Moderator
Glenn Horrocks
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Sydney, Australia
Posts: 17,870
Rep Power: 144 |
If the inlet is 0m/s there is no flow, so of course the pressure is 0Pa.
|
|
July 17, 2013, 05:44 |
|
#13 | |
Senior Member
Shashwat
Join Date: Nov 2011
Posts: 107
Rep Power: 15 |
Quote:
Thank you Dr If I introduce symmetry boundary condition at the inlet surface and outlet surface , what will be the effect?. I know that the flow is parallel to the symmetry boundary condition If the fluid enters through porous wall and due to Leakey on the surface the flow will comes out but the flow is not perpendicular to the surface . It should be parallel to the surface . DO you think that the symmetry boundary condition is suitable for this instead of putting inlet = 0 m/s and pressure 0 pa at the outlet. what do you think about if I activate buoyant flow option? |
||
July 17, 2013, 07:22 |
|
#14 |
Super Moderator
Glenn Horrocks
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Sydney, Australia
Posts: 17,870
Rep Power: 144 |
Your last post seems to suggest you have no idea how to model this at all. In this case can you post an image of what you intend to model - all of it, not just one little bit - and show what the flow path is intended to be?
|
|
July 17, 2013, 09:34 |
|
#15 | |
Senior Member
Shashwat
Join Date: Nov 2011
Posts: 107
Rep Power: 15 |
Quote:
Please find the attached model of our studies. fig1-fluid domain , fig 2- artery Porous domain, fig 3 sectional view of combined fluid domain and porous domain. We consider blood flow through multiple stenosed artery.currently we are taking single stenosis case. We have two cases; 1. Blood flow through rigid artery wall 2. blood flow through artery wall which is porous in nature. we are examine the pressure drop across the stenosis for the above cases under same physiologic transient velocity and pressure condition. we found from simulation, pressure drop_in rigid artery< pressure drop in porous artery. But my lecturer told in other way around . so, I confused with boundary conditions setting at the porous domain please help me to set the boundary conditions in overall. I need your advice and help in this regard please. |
||
July 17, 2013, 19:49 |
|
#16 |
Super Moderator
Glenn Horrocks
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Sydney, Australia
Posts: 17,870
Rep Power: 144 |
The fluid flow path is important. How much flow goes through the walls? And what is the source of the fluid coming through the walls (ie everywhere, or a specific location)? How much through the inlet and outlet? Any other flow sources or sinks?
|
|
July 17, 2013, 20:40 |
|
#17 | ||||
Senior Member
Shashwat
Join Date: Nov 2011
Posts: 107
Rep Power: 15 |
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
The wall is completely porous , Not a specific part Quote:
For your information we use SST model . we are expecting low Re turbulence Wall thickness 1mm POROSITY MODELS: AREA POROSITY: Option = Isotropic END LOSS MODEL: Loss Velocity Type = Superficial Option = Isotropic Loss ISOTROPIC LOSS MODEL: Option = Permeability and Loss Coefficient Permeability = 2e-18 [m^2] Resistance Loss Coefficient = loss coefficient END END VOLUME POROSITY: Option = Value Volume Porosity = 0.15 END END SOLID DEFINITION: artery Material = Artery wall Option = Material Library MORPHOLOGY: Option = Continuous Solid END END Thank you Last edited by shaswat; July 18, 2013 at 02:43. |
|||||
July 18, 2013, 09:57 |
|
#18 |
Super Moderator
Glenn Horrocks
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Sydney, Australia
Posts: 17,870
Rep Power: 144 |
The the inlet should be 0.2m/s (or a time function with an average of 0.2m/s), the outlet a pressure boundary at 0Pa and the other wall of the vessel has some function to control the amount of fluid which goes through the wall.
|
|
July 18, 2013, 20:37 |
|
#19 | |
Senior Member
Shashwat
Join Date: Nov 2011
Posts: 107
Rep Power: 15 |
Quote:
Can you please explain bit about the "some function to control the amount of fluid which goes through the wall". We interface fluid porous . what else required to define? Thank you |
||
July 19, 2013, 07:13 |
|
#20 |
Super Moderator
Glenn Horrocks
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Sydney, Australia
Posts: 17,870
Rep Power: 144 |
That has to start with you - you say fluid goes through the porous wall all over. So what controls it? You need some function to drive it. A defined flux? Maybe a concentration gradient? Maybe a constant value? So "some function" is a vague reference to the wide variety of functions you can use to define this flow.
|
|
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Outlet boundary condition for wave flume with interFoam solver | Arnoldinho | OpenFOAM | 9 | July 10, 2018 06:15 |
Setting outlet Pressure boundary condition using CAFFA code | Mukund Pondkule | Main CFD Forum | 0 | March 16, 2011 04:23 |
Outlet boundary condition | colen | CFX | 6 | March 8, 2010 23:49 |
VOF Outlet boundary condition in cfd - ace | JM | Main CFD Forum | 0 | December 15, 2006 09:07 |
Convective Heat Transfer - Heat Exchanger | Mark | CFX | 6 | November 15, 2004 16:55 |