|
[Sponsors] |
simplified paralle tube bundle simulation (porous domain) |
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Search this Thread | Display Modes |
May 4, 2013, 14:07 |
simplified paralle tube bundle simulation (porous domain)
|
#1 |
Member
Benny
Join Date: Apr 2012
Posts: 40
Rep Power: 14 |
Hi,
I tried to simulate the flow of air trough multiple parallel tubes. The first simulation with resolving each tube is running fine and the results are in agreement with expectations. But the simulation is for sure much too detailed and needs a lot of mesh points. therefore i tried to simulate the tube bundle using a porous domain (setting a porosity and direction). there are three domains, each a cylinder. the first is a fluid domain that contains the inlet. the second is the porous domain and the third a fluid domain that has the outlet. the interfaces between the domains are set. I observe that the flow trough the porous domain looks ok (expected average velocity) til the last nodes in the porous domain where the flow exits into the fluid domain. there is a big increase in velocity and the velocity profile looks wired. I tried a lot and could break it down that this effect is increased while decreasing the porosity. Has anybody observed this too? Do I need to set a specific expert parameter? I think this should be a standard application for a porous domain. Thanks |
|
May 5, 2013, 09:01 |
|
#2 |
Super Moderator
Glenn Horrocks
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Sydney, Australia
Posts: 17,871
Rep Power: 144 |
Please post an image of what you are seeing.
|
|
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Chemical Reaction in Porous Domain | cibo | CFX | 7 | October 21, 2019 08:55 |
How to specify Laminar zone for Porous domain | vemps | OpenFOAM Running, Solving & CFD | 1 | October 29, 2012 15:42 |
CFX domain comparison | Kiat110616 | CFX | 4 | April 3, 2011 23:43 |
porous domain problem | sudhakar | CFX | 6 | November 29, 2006 10:48 |
Help on simulation domain | Derek Jing | Main CFD Forum | 3 | June 6, 2002 21:21 |