|
[Sponsors] |
Error #001100279 Floating point exception: Zero divide |
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Search this Thread | Display Modes |
April 30, 2013, 14:55 |
Error #001100279 Floating point exception: Zero divide
|
#1 |
New Member
Seran Reschim
Join Date: Jun 2012
Posts: 9
Rep Power: 14 |
Dear all,
Now I have simulated the warehouse size 20*20*30 meters. It is quite big. I need to simulate and monitor the air temp in the warehouse (10 h). I work with transient model with time step = 1 hour. But I face with error as above Error #001100279 Floating point exception: Zero divide The software is Ansys 14 CFX. CPU core i5 with RAM 6 gb Please help . Thank you |
|
April 30, 2013, 18:25 |
|
#2 |
Senior Member
Erik
Join Date: Feb 2011
Location: Earth (Land portion)
Posts: 1,188
Rep Power: 23 |
What influenced you to choose a 1 hour time step? That's probably several orders of magnitude too big!
|
|
April 30, 2013, 20:36 |
|
#3 |
Super Moderator
Glenn Horrocks
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Sydney, Australia
Posts: 17,872
Rep Power: 144 |
FAQ: http://www.cfd-online.com/Wiki/Ansys...do_about_it.3F
But Erik is right - your time step is miles too big. |
|
May 1, 2013, 06:09 |
|
#4 |
Senior Member
Mr CFD
Join Date: Jun 2012
Location: Britain
Posts: 361
Rep Power: 15 |
In your warehouse do you have buoyancy driven flow?
In the CFX manual it tells you how to estimate the time step. If you're doing transient simulations you might want to consider adaptive time stepping. Set the maximum time step to something like 1hr and the minimum to something small like 1e-8s and try to converge within 5-10 loops. |
|
May 1, 2013, 08:01 |
|
#5 |
Super Moderator
Glenn Horrocks
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Sydney, Australia
Posts: 17,872
Rep Power: 144 |
Agreed, adaptive timestepping is the best choice - especially for beginners who have no idea of what timestep is really required. I would say that half the convergence problems we see on this forum are just from too large a timestep.
For most simulations 3-5 coeff loops is more appropriate. 5-10 is only required for models with tricky physics to converge suck as multiphase (but for most multphase models I still use 3-5). |
|
May 1, 2013, 08:49 |
|
#6 | |
Senior Member
Mr CFD
Join Date: Jun 2012
Location: Britain
Posts: 361
Rep Power: 15 |
Quote:
Would you consider buoyancy driven flow to be "tricky". |
||
May 1, 2013, 09:05 |
|
#7 |
Super Moderator
Glenn Horrocks
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Sydney, Australia
Posts: 17,872
Rep Power: 144 |
No. 'Tricky' means in this case where complex coupling between phases/physics is required; such as 2-way coupled particle tracking, eularian particle models, chemistry, radiation modelling where the fluid flow interacts 2-ways with the radiation modelling and things like that.
Buoyancy is still single phase so that is best done with short time steps converged quickly - so 3-5 coeff loops per iteration. |
|
May 4, 2013, 06:47 |
|
#8 |
New Member
Seran Reschim
Join Date: Jun 2012
Posts: 9
Rep Power: 14 |
Thank you all. I will try follow your suggest. Thank you again.
|
|
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
simpleFoam Floating point exception error -help | sudhasran | OpenFOAM Running, Solving & CFD | 3 | March 12, 2012 17:23 |
Pipe flow in settlingFoam floating point exception | jochemvandenbosch | OpenFOAM Running, Solving & CFD | 4 | February 16, 2012 04:24 |
block-structured mesh for t-junction | Robert@cfd | ANSYS Meshing & Geometry | 20 | November 11, 2011 05:59 |
Finished simulation doesn't start: floating point exception [Divide by zero] | MaxCFD | STAR-CCM+ | 3 | June 26, 2011 11:31 |
Floating point error: divide by zero | Chris | FLUENT | 2 | April 15, 2005 03:33 |