CFD Online Logo CFD Online URL
www.cfd-online.com
[Sponsors]
Home > Forums > Software User Forums > ANSYS > CFX

Meshing strategy/values

Register Blogs Community New Posts Updated Threads Search

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
Old   January 16, 2013, 13:38
Default Meshing strategy/values
  #1
Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2012
Posts: 32
Rep Power: 14
powpow is on a distinguished road
Hello,
I'm a newbie with meshing. But with the help of some tutorials and this forum, I was able to create my first mesh.

Since it is my first mesh, I don't know at all which values should be entered

To get an impression of the size, the dimensions of the test chamber are:
Length: 14 458 mm
Diameter: 3032 mm

So I tried it this way:
- Register Mesh - Surface Mesh Setup - Surfaces: I selected all surfaces, entered Maximum size: 150, Height: 150, Min size limit: 20 and all others: 0 - Apply.
- Register Mesh - Compute Mesh - Volume Mesh - Compute. Volume Mesh is Tetra/Mixed and Mesh Method is Robust (Octree)
- Check Mesh and ignoring multiple edges and single edges since they shouldn't be a problem. Delete unconnected vertices.
- Then, I wanted to add 10 layers of prism:
- Register Mesh - Compute Mesh - Prism Mesh.
- There I selected the parts for the prism layers, entered there num layers =10 and clicked "ok".
- Then I clicked surface mesh up, chose the surfaces of the tube and the small nozzle, changed Maximum size: 50, Height: 5, Min size limit: 10, Height Ratio: 1.5 and applied.
- Register Mesh - Compute Mesh - Volume Mesh. I enabled create prism layers and computed.
- Check Mesh and again ignoring multiple edges and single edges.

The result is shown in image001.

Unfortunately, some errors occured while doing the simulation with CFX-Solver Manager (see image002).

I hope someone can tell me, if the problem was the mesh or perhaps adjustments in CFX-Pre..

As I said above, I did never meshing before, so if someone can tell me better values than mine I would be very happy
Attached Images
File Type: jpg image001.jpg (94.6 KB, 10 views)
File Type: jpg image002.jpg (68.3 KB, 9 views)
powpow is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   January 16, 2013, 17:41
Default
  #2
Super Moderator
 
Glenn Horrocks
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Sydney, Australia
Posts: 17,871
Rep Power: 144
ghorrocks is just really niceghorrocks is just really niceghorrocks is just really niceghorrocks is just really nice
Your simulation runs for a bit then fails, so refer to these FAQS:
http://www.cfd-online.com/Wiki/Ansys...do_about_it.3F
http://www.cfd-online.com/Wiki/Ansys...gence_criteria
ghorrocks is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   January 17, 2013, 00:52
Default
  #3
Senior Member
 
cdegroot's Avatar
 
Chris DeGroot
Join Date: Nov 2011
Location: Canada
Posts: 414
Rep Power: 18
cdegroot is on a distinguished road
Octree volume meshes are not generally good for CFD. Use octree to get a good surface mesh then delete the volume elements and remesh the volume using Delaunay. Also you must smooth the mesh. It sounds like you are using ICEM CFD. Smooth until the "quality" is at least 0.3. You can also look at the meshing forum if you need help with meshing.

It's not possible to tell if your mesh size is good or bad. You need to run a mesh sensitivity study to determine if the mesh is fine enough or not.
cdegroot is offline   Reply With Quote

Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
[ICEM] Meshing strategy/values powpow ANSYS Meshing & Geometry 13 January 18, 2013 12:39
[ANSYS Meshing] Migrating from GAMBIT to ANSYS Meshing David-CFD ANSYS Meshing & Geometry 1 April 1, 2011 06:22
Singularity of grid?Volume meshing vs face meshing Ken Main CFD Forum 0 September 4, 2003 12:09
Volume Meshing & Face Meshing? singularity of grid ken FLUENT 0 September 4, 2003 12:08


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 11:49.