A simple problem about Adaptive Time steps

sakurabogoda · December 10, 2012, 23:34

I am using adaptive time steps for a simulation.

Min. time step= 0.0001S
Max. time step= 0.05S

My problem is, now the simulation is running around 5000 time steps, but it uses only 0.0001S for all steps.

Why the solver does not change the time step (its own time step)?

(I used this much of smaller time step as always solver diverged with larger time steppes, even for 0.001S)

ghorrocks · December 11, 2012, 04:57

Assuming you are using adaptive time steps homing into 3-5 coeff loops per iteration (which is the general recommendation), then if it keeps making the time step size smaller and smaller you have some issues to consider:
1) Is this just an initial transient thing, which has no bearing on the overall simulation accuracy? If so then you can just use the lower time step limit to stop it going too far, converge loosely through this bit and it is OK providing the convergence recovers as the simulation progresses.
2) Is your convergence critereon too tight? Do a convergence sensitivity check to see if you need a convergence tolerance as tight as you currently have. Looser convergence = bigger time steps = faster simulation = happy boss.

Lance · December 11, 2012, 04:58

Well, what is your critera for adaptive stepping? Max Courant number or specified coefficient loops? For example, if the solver cannot converge within the max coeff loops it will try to decrease the timestep until the min allowed time step.

sakurabogoda · December 11, 2012, 05:27

Dear Glenn and Lance,
Many many thanks...

Glenn:
01. This is for overall simulation. I am working with cyclone flow.
02.Actually I am using 3 coeff loops per iteration and convergence tolerance is e-6.

Lance:
Though CFX is implicit I used courant no. 0.1 and 0.5 to lower and upper limits because I am using LES. Also 3 coeff loops per iteration.

*Thanks again for your advises and I will do a sensitivity analysis by adjusting coeff loops and convergence criteria.

Lance · December 11, 2012, 05:34

Ok, max courant at 0.5 and residuals at 1e-6 might be too tight to get convergence within 3 coeff loops with a time step at 1e-4 s, which explains why the solver stays at the minimum allowed time step.

sakurabogoda · December 11, 2012, 07:02

Dear All, I have tried the simulation again with following adjustments, but solver diverged.

max. courent no. = 1.0, min. courent no. =0.5
convergent criteria = e-5
max. coeff. loops per iteration = 5
time step = 0.001S

the problem is, all simulations ran correctly with inlet velocities of 5m/s and 10m/s and the solver diverges with 15m/s inlet velocity.

As the expectation is highly turbulent flow, is it possible to increase courant no and convergence criteria?

Lance · December 11, 2012, 07:27

Quote:

Originally Posted by sakurabogoda

As the expectation is highly turbulent flow, is it possible to increase courant no and convergence criteria?

why not test and find out for yourself?
However, LES often requires a very fine time step to resolve the scales accurately and it could be that 0.001 s is not sufficient.

ghorrocks · December 11, 2012, 18:01

The general recommendation is to use adaptive time stepping homing in on 3-5 coeff loops per iteration. Courant number adaptive time steps are not generally recommended. And as suspected your convergence toelrance is very tight for a transient run and can almost certainly be relaxed. You need to do a sensitivity analysis to determine what the correct convergence tolerance for your case is.

sakurabogoda · December 11, 2012, 22:00

Dear All,
Thank you very much.
I used adaptive time stepping with 1e-4 convergence and there too, time steps did not change. Simulation runs with time step=0.0001s only.
The problem is then the simulation takes too much time but I think this is the max time step that I can choose.

Thanks a lot for your kind helps again.

ghorrocks · December 12, 2012, 06:22

Welcome to CFD

, this is why people use super computers for CFD.

Did you do a sensitivity study of did you just try 1e-4? Unless you actually determine what you need you are guessing. And you could save your self a lot of time and effort by just drawing the results you want to see in photoshop.

But do not compromise the accuracy of your simulation by setting a big minimum time step. Rather get a more powerful computer or more parallel power. And don't forget to do sensitivity checks on mesh, time step and convergence tolerance so you do not set them too coarse or fine.

December 10, 2012, 23:34	A simple problem about Adaptive Time steps	#1
sakurabogoda Senior Member S.Bogoda Join Date: Jul 2012 Posts: 133 Rep Power: 14	I am using adaptive time steps for a simulation. Min. time step= 0.0001S Max. time step= 0.05S My problem is, now the simulation is running around 5000 time steps, but it uses only 0.0001S for all steps. Why the solver does not change the time step (its own time step)? (I used this much of smaller time step as always solver diverged with larger time steppes, even for 0.001S)

Similar Threads
Thread	Thread Starter	Forum	Replies	Last Post
Extrusion with OpenFoam problem No. Iterations 0	Lord Kelvin	OpenFOAM Running, Solving & CFD	8	March 28, 2016 12:08
Orifice Plate with a fully developed flow - Problems with convergence	jonmec	OpenFOAM Running, Solving & CFD	3	July 28, 2011 06:24
time steps problem in cfd	kvimalraj	Main CFD Forum	0	March 22, 2011 03:10
Full pipe 3D using icoFoam	cyberbrain	OpenFOAM	4	March 16, 2011 10:20
unsteady calcs in FLUENT	Sanjay Padhiar	Main CFD Forum	1	March 31, 1999 13:32

December 11, 2012, 04:57		#2
ghorrocks Super Moderator Glenn Horrocks Join Date: Mar 2009 Location: Sydney, Australia Posts: 17,870 Rep Power: 144	Assuming you are using adaptive time steps homing into 3-5 coeff loops per iteration (which is the general recommendation), then if it keeps making the time step size smaller and smaller you have some issues to consider: 1) Is this just an initial transient thing, which has no bearing on the overall simulation accuracy? If so then you can just use the lower time step limit to stop it going too far, converge loosely through this bit and it is OK providing the convergence recovers as the simulation progresses. 2) Is your convergence critereon too tight? Do a convergence sensitivity check to see if you need a convergence tolerance as tight as you currently have. Looser convergence = bigger time steps = faster simulation = happy boss.

December 11, 2012, 04:58		#3
Lance Senior Member Lance Join Date: Mar 2009 Posts: 669 Rep Power: 22	Well, what is your critera for adaptive stepping? Max Courant number or specified coefficient loops? For example, if the solver cannot converge within the max coeff loops it will try to decrease the timestep until the min allowed time step.

December 11, 2012, 05:27		#4
sakurabogoda Senior Member S.Bogoda Join Date: Jul 2012 Posts: 133 Rep Power: 14	Dear Glenn and Lance, Many many thanks... Glenn: 01. This is for overall simulation. I am working with cyclone flow. 02.Actually I am using 3 coeff loops per iteration and convergence tolerance is e-6. Lance: Though CFX is implicit I used courant no. 0.1 and 0.5 to lower and upper limits because I am using LES. Also 3 coeff loops per iteration. *Thanks again for your advises and I will do a sensitivity analysis by adjusting coeff loops and convergence criteria.

December 11, 2012, 05:34		#5
Lance Senior Member Lance Join Date: Mar 2009 Posts: 669 Rep Power: 22	Ok, max courant at 0.5 and residuals at 1e-6 might be too tight to get convergence within 3 coeff loops with a time step at 1e-4 s, which explains why the solver stays at the minimum allowed time step.

December 11, 2012, 07:02		#6
sakurabogoda Senior Member S.Bogoda Join Date: Jul 2012 Posts: 133 Rep Power: 14	Dear All, I have tried the simulation again with following adjustments, but solver diverged. max. courent no. = 1.0, min. courent no. =0.5 convergent criteria = e-5 max. coeff. loops per iteration = 5 time step = 0.001S the problem is, all simulations ran correctly with inlet velocities of 5m/s and 10m/s and the solver diverges with 15m/s inlet velocity. As the expectation is highly turbulent flow, is it possible to increase courant no and convergence criteria?

December 11, 2012, 18:01		#8
ghorrocks Super Moderator Glenn Horrocks Join Date: Mar 2009 Location: Sydney, Australia Posts: 17,870 Rep Power: 144	The general recommendation is to use adaptive time stepping homing in on 3-5 coeff loops per iteration. Courant number adaptive time steps are not generally recommended. And as suspected your convergence toelrance is very tight for a transient run and can almost certainly be relaxed. You need to do a sensitivity analysis to determine what the correct convergence tolerance for your case is.

December 11, 2012, 22:00		#9
sakurabogoda Senior Member S.Bogoda Join Date: Jul 2012 Posts: 133 Rep Power: 14	Dear All, Thank you very much. I used adaptive time stepping with 1e-4 convergence and there too, time steps did not change. Simulation runs with time step=0.0001s only. The problem is then the simulation takes too much time but I think this is the max time step that I can choose. Thanks a lot for your kind helps again.

December 12, 2012, 06:22		#10
ghorrocks Super Moderator Glenn Horrocks Join Date: Mar 2009 Location: Sydney, Australia Posts: 17,870 Rep Power: 144	Welcome to CFD , this is why people use super computers for CFD. Did you do a sensitivity study of did you just try 1e-4? Unless you actually determine what you need you are guessing. And you could save your self a lot of time and effort by just drawing the results you want to see in photoshop. But do not compromise the accuracy of your simulation by setting a big minimum time step. Rather get a more powerful computer or more parallel power. And don't forget to do sensitivity checks on mesh, time step and convergence tolerance so you do not set them too coarse or fine.