|
[Sponsors] |
November 19, 2012, 17:48 |
|
#21 |
Super Moderator
Glenn Horrocks
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Sydney, Australia
Posts: 17,870
Rep Power: 144 |
What is k? What is this equation representing?
|
|
November 19, 2012, 19:36 |
|
#22 |
Member
liuzexiang
Join Date: Oct 2012
Location: China
Posts: 69
Rep Power: 14 |
i am so sorry that i forgot explain the K. the K in the equation is present electrical conductivity of the flow. the whole equation is the relation of the electrical conductivity with gas volume fraction and temperature of the flow.
|
|
November 20, 2012, 18:34 |
|
#23 |
Super Moderator
Glenn Horrocks
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Sydney, Australia
Posts: 17,870
Rep Power: 144 |
Why shouldn't this just be a function of the local volume fraction and temperature? Why does the vf and t of somewhere else affect the value (this happens through the averaging process)?
|
|
November 21, 2012, 07:28 |
|
#24 |
Member
liuzexiang
Join Date: Oct 2012
Location: China
Posts: 69
Rep Power: 14 |
there is just the experience formula. so i do the simulate to find the effect to the current density.
|
|
November 21, 2012, 19:21 |
|
#25 |
Super Moderator
Glenn Horrocks
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Sydney, Australia
Posts: 17,870
Rep Power: 144 |
What do you mean by "there is just the experience formula."?
The electrical conductivity of a control volume should be (in my understanding) a function of the conditions in that control volume only, so: k=a*gas.vf + b*T Where gas.vf and T are the local volume fraction and temperature. The solver will then do the current density simulation with a varying conducitivity and will work out all the path effects. This approach is simple to implement. Is this approach valid? If not valid can you explain why not? |
|
November 21, 2012, 22:08 |
|
#26 |
Member
liuzexiang
Join Date: Oct 2012
Location: China
Posts: 69
Rep Power: 14 |
yes, i think it is a valid approach and i had gain the differert current density without a varying conducitivity in the simulation.but as the relation of the conductivity and the gas. VF and temperature had established, i can not know how to do in my simulation. so i can not gain the result.
|
|
November 21, 2012, 22:15 |
|
#27 |
Member
liuzexiang
Join Date: Oct 2012
Location: China
Posts: 69
Rep Power: 14 |
sorry,ghorrocks, "there is just the experience formula." means that it is j an experience equation. maybe the temperature also effected the gas.VF. so the relation is a multiplication not a addition.
|
|
November 22, 2012, 05:26 |
|
#28 |
Super Moderator
Glenn Horrocks
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Sydney, Australia
Posts: 17,870
Rep Power: 144 |
I do not know what you mean by the last comment and I still cannot see you a simple local equation is not suitable.
But I will forget that and just try to implement what you want. You say "k(z)=k0*(1+a*(T(z)-T0)*(1-b(z))),where,k0 and T0 is initialization, and the T(Z) and the b(z) is the temperature function and gas volume fraction function along the z axis respectively.". What function controls k(z), T(z) and b(z)? Is the simulation 1D? Can you post an image of the geometry? And describe the flow? |
|
November 29, 2012, 04:15 |
|
#29 |
Member
liuzexiang
Join Date: Oct 2012
Location: China
Posts: 69
Rep Power: 14 |
hi, ghorrocks, i am sorry for the late reply. i try to upload a picture but unsuccessful. the simulation is not 1D but 3D. the T(Z) and K(Z) is just the assumption, actually they are the functions of position. so gaining the T and K at different position is the key for the question. thank you !
|
|
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Difficulty in calculating angular velocity of Savonius turbine simulation | alfaruk | CFX | 14 | March 17, 2017 07:08 |
Simulation time vs. Simulation Cell Count | chrisoturner | Main CFD Forum | 7 | September 8, 2012 18:46 |
Fan simulation divergence | ayothicfd | CFX | 18 | July 20, 2012 06:53 |
define the immersed solid domain motion in transient simulation | TURBO_SPP | CFX | 0 | July 12, 2012 23:10 |
GUI crash and simulation engine still running | RPJones | FLOW-3D | 2 | November 9, 2010 09:18 |