|
[Sponsors] |
September 24, 2012, 11:10 |
No turbulence generation in a porous domain
|
#1 |
Senior Member
Stuart
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: Portsmouth, England
Posts: 742
Rep Power: 26 |
Hi,
I'm modelling (steady RANS SST) a porous domain representing an air filter. On each end of the porous domain is a fluid domain for the inlet and outlet airflows - e.g. CFX catalytic converter tutorial. In reality the filter consists of small random pathways which the air passes through, so any turbulent structures are eliminated by the filter media. Then downstream of the filter the air can then develop any new turbulent sturctures. I guess this would be similar to modelling a turbulence screen that can be found in wind tunnels. How can I model the porous domain with turbulence removal? I've tried setting: Porous Domain > Fluid Models > Turbulence > Advanced Turbulence Control > Eddy Viscosity > Value = 0 Pa s. But then CFX copied this value to the two fluid domains, which is not right. My next option is to create a turbulence sink via a subdomain in the porous domain. However, this option is requiring a source and a source coefficient. Do I just set these to 0 in the porous domain? Or is there another way to do this? Thanks |
|
September 24, 2012, 22:52 |
|
#2 |
Super Moderator
Glenn Horrocks
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Sydney, Australia
Posts: 17,870
Rep Power: 144 |
I would use a source term. I am not sure whether the best way would be to specify zero turbulent energy in the porous region - you might not be able to use zero, you might need to set a low value. Alternately you could set the turbulence dissipation to be very high (if using the k-e turbulence model) and then turbulence will naturally damp out very quickly.
|
|
September 25, 2012, 06:00 |
|
#3 |
Senior Member
Stuart
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: Portsmouth, England
Posts: 742
Rep Power: 26 |
As mentioned in the top of the first post I'm using the SST model.
I've set a subdomain within the porous domain and set the turbulent kinetic energy source to zero. Is that what you meant? |
|
September 25, 2012, 09:10 |
|
#4 |
Super Moderator
Glenn Horrocks
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Sydney, Australia
Posts: 17,870
Rep Power: 144 |
Yes, that is what I meant. But I am not sure that the turbulence model will gracefully handle zero turbulent kinetic energy - you might need to set it to a small finite number. But if it runs OK at zero then no problems.
|
|
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Chemical Reaction in Porous Domain | cibo | CFX | 7 | October 21, 2019 08:55 |
CFX domain comparison | Kiat110616 | CFX | 4 | April 3, 2011 23:43 |
General question concerning porous domain | Boris Tobias | CFX | 0 | November 19, 2010 05:13 |
Material definition of a porous domain | Hitch8 | CFX | 0 | May 3, 2010 06:00 |
Porous Domain | sam | CFX | 3 | November 4, 2007 11:57 |