 |
 |
 |
|
|
|
[Sponsors] | ||||
September 21, 2012, 06:40
|
Result comparision of CFX and fluent
|
#1 |
|
New Member
sunxihui
Join Date: Sep 2012
Posts: 3
Rep Power: 14  |
Dear all:
now i am working on fin simulation by CFX and fluent with laminar flow model undert same boundary conditions and same mesh. Boundary conditions are listed as flollow: Given air's inlet velocity and temperature, air outlet pressure; Given fin's temperature. The profile of temperature and pressure in post-process are almost same. But there are some difference between CFX and fluent to the total heat load. The heat load calculated by fluent is almost double than done by CFX. i doubted it maybe due to different difinition of heat flux between CFX and fluent, so anyone here met such problems before? i need you help! thank you. |
|
|
|
|
|
September 24, 2012, 21:42
|
|
#2 |
|
Super Moderator
Glenn Horrocks
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Sydney, Australia
Posts: 17,854
Rep Power: 144 |
||
|
|
|
|
 |
| Tags |
| cfx, fluent, result comparision |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Comparison of fluent and CFX for turbomachinery | Far | CFX | 52 | December 26, 2014 19:11 |
| Different result in CFX and fluent for mass trans.? is segregated better? | ftab | CFX | 7 | September 27, 2012 08:57 |
| CFX or Fluent for Turbo machinery ? | Far | FLUENT | 3 | May 27, 2011 04:02 |
| Fluent Vs CFX, density and pressure | Omer | CFX | 9 | June 28, 2007 05:13 |
| Comparision of FLUENT $ CFX | Congli Cheng | CFX | 2 | September 16, 2002 00:06 |
Linear Mode
