|
[Sponsors] |
variable density in single fluid simulation not running with total energy |
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Search this Thread | Display Modes |
September 18, 2012, 07:34 |
variable density in single fluid simulation not running with total energy
|
#1 |
New Member
Sebastian
Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: Cologne
Posts: 10
Rep Power: 16 |
Dear CFX-Users,
i have a problem simulating a single fluid case with variable density. i used an expression in CEL for modelling the density. the density decreases for low pressure values and should represent the increasing bubble friction (desorption of non condensable gases) in areas of pressure below the atmospheric pressure. in my simulation model there is couette and poseuille flow through a gap (rotor-stator). the boundary conditions are total pressure at the inlet and opening entrainment at the outlet. i allready have done some other simulations with these boundaries and the total energy model but different fluid propperties as variable densities on multiphase flow. they did all work. for the single fluid simulation the solver writes an error "divide by zero" and even an initialisation from a constant density simulation does not solve the problem for total energy model. i also tried some oter timesteps. furthermore the obove described CEL density expression workes fine with an thermal energy model or isotherm as well. can anyone tell me, why i get the divide by zero error? the error does not occure whithin my CEL expressions, in this case the solver would tell me the problematic CEL. kind regards yours viking |
|
September 18, 2012, 21:17 |
|
#2 |
Super Moderator
Glenn Horrocks
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Sydney, Australia
Posts: 17,854
Rep Power: 144 |
When you put weird kinks and bends in the density curve that always makes convergence difficult. Your problem is simply difficult numerics (assuming there is no gross error in your equations).
One hint is to make sure that the density is continuous against pressure (I assume you have density as a function of pressure), and preferably keep the first derivative continuous as well. |
|
September 18, 2012, 21:19 |
|
#3 |
Super Moderator
Glenn Horrocks
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Sydney, Australia
Posts: 17,854
Rep Power: 144 |
And also consider using the cavitation model for this as well. The physics are quite similar so you may be able to adapt the cavitation model to this. That model has stuff built in to handle the convergence difficulties.
|
|
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Error message: Insufficient Catalogue Size | Paresh Jain | CFX | 33 | August 16, 2024 06:09 |
error in COMSOL:'ERROR:6164 Duplicate Variable' | bhushas | COMSOL | 1 | May 30, 2008 05:35 |
What is the total energy for incompressible fluid? | Harry Dong | Main CFD Forum | 12 | February 4, 2006 01:55 |
Energy dissipation and Drag coefficient | Freeman | Main CFD Forum | 10 | January 27, 2006 08:42 |
Why FVM for high-Re flows? | Zhong Lei | Main CFD Forum | 23 | May 14, 1999 14:22 |