|
[Sponsors] |
True Impact of Using "Relax Mass" Expert parameter for transient runs |
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Search this Thread | Display Modes |
July 31, 2012, 11:57 |
True Impact of Using "Relax Mass" Expert parameter for transient runs
|
#1 | |
Member
jonathan
Join Date: Jun 2009
Posts: 47
Rep Power: 18 |
I'm attempting to start a transient solution using a res file for initial conditions and I get an overflow error around the 3 coeffiecient loop of the first timestep. I thought perhaps applying a relaxation to my solution may help the startup of the run.
Upon reading the CFX help I noticed that under the help section for "relax mass" it statest that default is 0.75 but then in the description it states Quote:
Anybody have better insight into this? Further does anyone have any advice as to what relaxation settings might help the startup of my run? Thanks. |
||
July 31, 2012, 20:04 |
|
#2 |
Super Moderator
Glenn Horrocks
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Sydney, Australia
Posts: 17,854
Rep Power: 144 |
You would have to discuss it with CFX support to get details of exactly what is happening. Full details of expert parameters are not published.
|
|
August 1, 2012, 09:20 |
|
#3 |
Member
jonathan
Join Date: Jun 2009
Posts: 47
Rep Power: 18 |
I appreciate the reply ghorrocks. I guess I'm not looking for anything in detail, but rather a summary statment as to what the effects on my results would be if I were to use this relaxation in transient runs.
But you are correct that probably my best avenue will be to contact ANSYS support. |
|
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
MAxium residual...confusion with expert parameter | KK | CFX | 3 | February 8, 2008 11:47 |
asking for a few expert parameter for rotarywing | charles | CFX | 4 | November 3, 2006 15:15 |
Expert Parameter for compressible transient | ioannis | CFX | 0 | November 2, 2005 20:28 |