|
[Sponsors] |
Setting Opening Boundary to Move Normal to Itself |
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Search this Thread | Display Modes |
April 18, 2012, 15:36 |
Setting Opening Boundary to Move Normal to Itself
|
#1 |
Member
Nick Cleveland
Join Date: Mar 2012
Posts: 35
Rep Power: 14 |
Is it possible in CFX to prescribe mesh motion of an opening-type boundary, normal to that boundary?
I am modeling a stamping process with 2-way FSI in ANSYS. The stamp is the elastic solid that presses down into a high viscosity fluid, which has a free surface in contact with air. I must let the air out as the solid stamp presses down, so the opening boundary allows for that. However, extreme stretch that causes error occurs at the edge of the FSI where the ANSYS Mechanical domain meets the CFX domain (I have circled the spot in the attached pic). This stretching is from the stamp moving down but the opening boundary adjacent to it being fixed in place. The error occurs in Mechanical, and the ANSYSout message is: "*** ERROR *** CP = 200.040 TIME= 12:20:50 One or more elements have become highly distorted. Excessive distortion of elements is usually a symptom indicating the need for corrective action elsewhere. Try ramping the load up instead of step applying the load (KBC,1). You may need to improve your mesh to obtain elements with better aspect ratios. Also consider the behavior of materials, contact pairs, and/or constraint equations. If this message appears in the first iteration of first substep, be sure to run shape checking of elements." and occurs right as the CFX monitors start up in the solver. Is it possible in CFX to prescribe mesh motion of an opening-type boundary, normal to that boundary? Last edited by NCle; April 18, 2012 at 15:37. Reason: add pic |
|
April 18, 2012, 15:39 |
picture of model
|
#2 |
Member
Nick Cleveland
Join Date: Mar 2012
Posts: 35
Rep Power: 14 |
picture of model
|
|
April 19, 2012, 10:11 |
|
#3 |
Super Moderator
Glenn Horrocks
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Sydney, Australia
Posts: 17,870
Rep Power: 144 |
You do not want the opening to move. It will stuff up the boundary condition.
Have you considered using a GGI interface to make this motion use a simpler mesh motion? |
|
April 19, 2012, 11:17 |
Ggi
|
#4 |
Member
Nick Cleveland
Join Date: Mar 2012
Posts: 35
Rep Power: 14 |
No, haven't considered GGI for the FSI. I am now reading about GGI and trying to figure out how to implement it. Thank you for the advice and your time.
The help directory in CFX says GGI "performs an intersection procedure to connect the two sides of the interface together", which sounds like what I need, because there seems to be poor communication between CFX and ANSYS Mechanical. When I increase the viscosity closer to that which I need to model, this error occurs. It seems like the model handles "water" just fine but can't model "honey" without ANSYS returning the "excessive element deformation" message. I suppose with high viscosity the liquid puts too much shear force on the vertical FSI for ANSYS and CFX to exchange info there. Or, high viscosity fluids cant be solved in distorted elements as easily as low viscosity ones. Perhaps GGI will allow me to model the thick liquid. The CFX outfile says that CFX "failed to get total mesh displacement" from ANSYS when I raise viscosity. Can I simultaneously set the FSI interface boundary to be GGI, and also, where should I set it to GGI? In CFX, ANSYS Mechanical, or both? Thanks again. |
|
April 19, 2012, 11:22 |
I found tutorial
|
#5 |
Member
Nick Cleveland
Join Date: Mar 2012
Posts: 35
Rep Power: 14 |
ghorrocks,
I found a tutorial with GGI in CFX, so I will do that to find out how to use it. Thank you. |
|
April 19, 2012, 11:30 |
Chp 17
|
#6 |
Member
Nick Cleveland
Join Date: Mar 2012
Posts: 35
Rep Power: 14 |
Its Chp 17: M.ultiphase F.low i.n a. M.ixing V.essel
Incase anyone needs it. |
|
April 19, 2012, 12:13 |
|
#7 |
Member
Nick Cleveland
Join Date: Mar 2012
Posts: 35
Rep Power: 14 |
Do you know if it is possible to create a GGI-type interface between the solid and fluid domains in a 2-way FSI model?
I'm having trouble, because the solid domain is only in ANSYS Mech, so I can't prescribe the domain interface to be "fluid-solid", only "fluid-fluid" , as that is all that is in my CFX domain. I need the solid to be in ANSYS Mech so I can solve for strain and apply displacement. I assume the only way to select GGI is to create a new domain interface in CFX-pre. But when I do this, one of the "mesh motion options" is not "ANSYS Multifield" as it needs to be to set up the two-way info sharing between ANSYS Mech and CFX. An option is "ANSYS Multifield" only when I just make a regular wall boundary at the CFX/Mech interface, but this regular wall boundary doesn't let me use GGI. |
|
April 19, 2012, 13:10 |
mesh lined up
|
#8 |
Member
Nick Cleveland
Join Date: Mar 2012
Posts: 35
Rep Power: 14 |
This is a picture of my model mesh at the last timestep (of this run). Do I need GGI if the mesh at the interface stays lined up? (I realize now that the mesh on the horizontal FSI is not lined up, fixing that now)
|
|
April 19, 2012, 14:40 |
|
#9 |
Member
Nick Cleveland
Join Date: Mar 2012
Posts: 35
Rep Power: 14 |
Ok, an ANSYS customer support specialist informed me that GGI is automatically activated for the FSI I have.
Please disregard any questions I just posted about activating GGI. |
|
April 19, 2012, 19:35 |
|
#10 |
Super Moderator
Glenn Horrocks
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Sydney, Australia
Posts: 17,870
Rep Power: 144 |
|
|
April 20, 2012, 08:54 |
|
#11 |
Member
Nick Cleveland
Join Date: Mar 2012
Posts: 35
Rep Power: 14 |
I will try that.
|
|
Tags |
opening boundary motion |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Domain Imbalance | HMR | CFX | 5 | October 10, 2016 06:57 |
Normal velocity at the symmetry boundary | Seventy | FLUENT | 1 | October 26, 2009 07:52 |
Help!!!: Direction / Normal of Boundary Layer | JP | FLUENT | 0 | September 9, 2008 19:16 |
[Commercial meshers] Trimmed cell and embedded refinement mesh conversion issues | michele | OpenFOAM Meshing & Mesh Conversion | 2 | July 15, 2005 05:15 |
Warning 097- | AB | Siemens | 6 | November 15, 2004 05:41 |