CFD Online Logo CFD Online URL
www.cfd-online.com
[Sponsors]
Home > Forums > Software User Forums > ANSYS

problem coming during prism creation in icemcfd

Register Blogs Community New Posts Updated Threads Search

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
Old   August 5, 2010, 03:22
Smile problem coming during prism creation in icemcfd
  #1
New Member
 
ashish
Join Date: May 2010
Posts: 6
Rep Power: 16
ashish agrahari is on a distinguished road
hey frnds...this is the first time i m writing thread..i ve done unstructured mesh in icemcfd for full aircraft and after that i tried to create 20 prism layers but it ended with one problem showing "null dir in move_v_to_levelset"...it wrote upto 8 prism layers but after that its showing the above mentioned prob...can anybody help me regarding this......as soon as possible...waiting eagerly for ur replies....



thank you

ashish agrahari
ashish agrahari is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   August 5, 2010, 10:32
Default Trouble calculating Prism direction...
  #2
Senior Member
 
PSYMN's Avatar
 
Simon Pereira
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Ann Arbor, MI
Posts: 2,663
Blog Entries: 1
Rep Power: 47
PSYMN has a spectacular aura aboutPSYMN has a spectacular aura about
u don't know such an easy answer? - Karma

On CFD Online, you help others with questions that are easy for you and people will help you with questions that are easy for them... Think about it because Karma 's a bitch.

In this case, prism is complaining that it can't figure out the direction to grow in. I usually see this in a situation where a node is located between two overlapping plates... Imagine a situation where two steel bars with square cross sections cross. They touch and form a square contact patch. At the corners of the contact patch, the normal directions are not clear (there are two possibilities and neither is right... You probably have a configuration like that in your model. You can fix it by either adjusting your geometry so this doesn't happen (add a fillet or something between the bars) or just move the corner node a little off the corner (this may result in fairly poor quality, but it will work).

I can help more if you can be more specific about the results of the error, etc. What problem is it showing?
PSYMN is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   August 6, 2010, 02:04
Default
  #3
New Member
 
ashish
Join Date: May 2010
Posts: 6
Rep Power: 16
ashish agrahari is on a distinguished road
hey thanks for replying...i got u but adjusting nodes of full aircraft is very difficult and it will take lot of time ...can u suggest any other way..if it is there...is there any problem in prism settings given at the starting..?
ashish agrahari is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   August 6, 2010, 02:08
Default
  #4
New Member
 
ashish
Join Date: May 2010
Posts: 6
Rep Power: 16
ashish agrahari is on a distinguished road
i got 10 prism layers but getting surface orientation problem...while trying for 20 layers it showing "null dir in move_v_to_levelset"...it is d same prob showing again ...my mesh(unstructured _quality is very low...is there anything to do with that...but no errors are coming ...
ashish agrahari is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   August 6, 2010, 02:43
Default
  #5
New Member
 
ashish
Join Date: May 2010
Posts: 6
Rep Power: 16
ashish agrahari is on a distinguished road
i got 10 prism layers but getting surface orientation problem...while trying for 20 layers it showing "null dir in move_v_to_levelset"...it is d same prob showing again ...my mesh(unstructured _quality is very low...is there anything to do with that...but no errors are coming ...
ashish agrahari is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   August 6, 2010, 09:39
Default Hmmm...
  #6
Senior Member
 
PSYMN's Avatar
 
Simon Pereira
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Ann Arbor, MI
Posts: 2,663
Blog Entries: 1
Rep Power: 47
PSYMN has a spectacular aura aboutPSYMN has a spectacular aura about
If you got 10 layers, then it wasn't the geometry issue I was thinking of.

But yes, you should smooth as much as possible to get the surface mesh quality as high as possible before running prism. I also usually run a few iteration with Laplace since it helps smooth out any volume transitions. Once prism is grown, it restricts the smoother (to prevent twisting prisms) and it becomes very difficult to smooth, so smooth with tetra while it is easy.

If you have inside curvature (prisms growing in toward a tighter space) you may need to reduce the layer height, etc just to fit them in...

I would need to see a screen shot for a better guess of what you could do to fix it, can you run a cut plane thru the worst area and post the image?
PSYMN is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   August 11, 2010, 11:31
Default
  #7
New Member
 
Scott
Join Date: Aug 2010
Posts: 2
Rep Power: 0
Seattle_Hokie is on a distinguished road
I have run into these errors before. No fun at all. Try a few things.

1) If there are any surfaces that are parallel, or nearly parallel then your 20 prism layers may run into each other. In these regions, you would want to select less than 20 layers, or limit the height

2) Instead of extruding 20 layers, try to extrude 1 layer that is the full height of the intended 20 layers. You can then split this large prism into 20 smaller prisms. This usually ends up yielding a better grid in the end anyway

3) Sometimes when fillets or corners have insufficient grid, the initial tet mesh can overlap. Although tedious, these errors must be corrected. You have to go looking for them, destroy the cells effected and patch it back together manually.

4) Along with 3, you could start out with a defeatured aircraft with less detail, this should help 1 2 and 3.

5) There is an option to write out the mesh after each level. If you do this, and load the mesh with 10 layers, you may see upon close inspection where the mesh will fail if an additional layer is added.
5) If none of this works, try, try again...
Seattle_Hokie is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   August 11, 2010, 16:51
Default
  #8
Senior Member
 
PSYMN's Avatar
 
Simon Pereira
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Ann Arbor, MI
Posts: 2,663
Blog Entries: 1
Rep Power: 47
PSYMN has a spectacular aura aboutPSYMN has a spectacular aura about
A lot of ICEM CFD users like that 1 layer and split method that Seattle_Hokie suggested. Personally, I prefer to grow at least 3 layers and then split... So for 20 layers, instead of one layer split into 20, I might do 3 layers, each split into 7 and then redistributed, or the other way round, 7 layers split into 3. It is a compromise that gives a better result (in my opinion).

The prism tool has lots of smarts in it that help prisms turn corners, etc. You lose all these benefits when you grow a single layer. If you are not interested in those benefits, then I suggest you just turn off the layer smoothing, etc. and run your larger number of layers. It is very quick without all that fancy stuff.
PSYMN is offline   Reply With Quote

Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
a problem of icemcfd in linux anne Main CFD Forum 0 March 12, 2008 05:55
How to mesh axisymmetric 2D problem using prism... sameer CFX 2 March 7, 2006 14:14
need help on Prism Mesh Generation Pete CFX 0 December 6, 2004 03:11
extremely simple problem... can you solve it properly? Mikhail Main CFD Forum 40 September 9, 1999 10:11
Is this problem well posed? Thomas P. Abraham Main CFD Forum 5 September 8, 1999 15:52


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 17:17.