|
[Sponsors] |
June 8, 2010, 10:12 |
Pitch and frame change
|
#1 |
New Member
Andy Good
Join Date: Jul 2009
Posts: 11
Rep Power: 17 |
Hi all,
Just a quick question. I'm simulating a rotor and the CFX literature often refers to pitch change and frame change at the interface between rotor and stator. I roughly undestand the principle but I don't really see a difference in the two. Could someone explain them for me as I can't find a definition anywhere? Many thanks, Andy |
|
July 7, 2010, 09:52 |
|
#2 |
New Member
Join Date: May 2010
Posts: 24
Rep Power: 16 |
Also you have made this post nearly one month ago I will give you an answer:
A Frame Change occurs when you change the speed of rotation (for example from 310 rad/s to 0 rad/s -> Rotor - Stator). A change of speed from 310 to 155 rad/s is another example. In CFX you can do such a frame change with a Stage or with a Frozen Rotor Interface. Pitch change is necessary if the number of blade is different. Example: 4 blades in rotor, 5 blades in diffusor. The pitch change describes the ratio between those different numbers (in this example 0.8). |
|
July 7, 2010, 09:55 |
|
#3 |
New Member
Andy Good
Join Date: Jul 2009
Posts: 11
Rep Power: 17 |
Thanks for that. That makes much more sense now..
Just to clarify, is Frame Change for the two domains at a point in time (ie stator is stationary @ 0rad/s while the rotor is rotating at 310rad/s) or for when the relative rotational speed changes in time (ie, relative rotation between rotor and stator is 310rad/s and then changes to 0rad/s)? I think its the first option but I just want to be clear. Last edited by Andy QUB; July 7, 2010 at 10:11. Reason: Extra question to ask. |
|
July 8, 2010, 04:41 |
|
#4 |
New Member
Join Date: May 2010
Posts: 24
Rep Power: 16 |
Frame Change is for one point in time. Your first assumption is correct.
Your second example (reduction of rotational speed from 310 rad/s to 0 rad/s) requires a transient simulation. Therefore you can nevertheless use a frozen rotor interface (as far as i know). In this way both of your assumptions should be correct (the first one is to 100% correct, for the second assumption I'm not 100% sure). Last edited by Max Efficiency; July 8, 2010 at 04:44. Reason: added last sentence |
|
July 8, 2010, 06:10 |
|
#5 |
New Member
Andy Good
Join Date: Jul 2009
Posts: 11
Rep Power: 17 |
Great, thanks..
|
|
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Wind turbine simulation | Saturn | CFX | 60 | July 17, 2024 06:45 |
RPM in Wind Turbine | Pankaj | CFX | 9 | November 23, 2009 05:05 |
More Rotating reference frame problems | DaveG | CFX | 2 | October 26, 2005 17:47 |
Stage Interface Without Frame Change | Vikram | CFX | 2 | October 21, 2005 05:55 |