CFD Online Logo CFD Online URL
www.cfd-online.com
[Sponsors]
Home > Forums > Software User Forums > ANSYS

Cyclone Efficiency

Register Blogs Community New Posts Updated Threads Search

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
Old   November 24, 2021, 23:22
Default Cyclone Efficiency
  #1
RSM
New Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2021
Posts: 9
Rep Power: 5
RSM is on a distinguished road
Hi i am a masters student, i am new to this fluent ansys simulation.
I did a cyclone simulation with fluent ansys for my thesis research.
I tried to simulate the cyclone from wang et al 2006 journal, but when i increase the inlet speed, the efficiency decreases.
I've tried increasing the iteration value, but I haven't seen any changes yet
I tried this simulation in steady state and using the rsm model, using DPM and rosin-rammler, boundary condition that i used is velocity inlet, outflow and wall.
First order scheme for momentum equation and the turbulent kinetic energy k and the turbulent dissipation rate ε and the Reynolds stress equations were employed for spatial discretisation. The SIMPLEC algorithm was used for pressure-velocity coupling and the standard scheme for pressure discretisation.
I hope to get some suggestions
thanks in advance for the reply
RSM is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   November 25, 2021, 15:39
Default
  #2
Member
 
Guvennergiz's Avatar
 
Guven Nergiz
Join Date: Jul 2020
Location: Turkey
Posts: 52
Rep Power: 6
Guvennergiz is on a distinguished road
I have 2 questions depends on your case;
1) While you saying inlet speed, do you mean there is a inlet velocity boundary condition in your case? If you say so, shouldnt be a vacuum boundary condition intead of velocity inlet in cyclones?
2) Wouldn't it be more difficult for the particles to escape the flow due to centripetal forces from high velocities? Isn't it normal for efficiency to drop for this reason?
Guvennergiz is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   November 25, 2021, 22:39
Default
  #3
RSM
New Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2021
Posts: 9
Rep Power: 5
RSM is on a distinguished road
Yes velocity inlet in the boundary condition
But in the journal that i was tried to simulate, the efficiency increases
Attached Images
File Type: jpg iterasi 1000.jpg (53.5 KB, 13 views)
RSM is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   November 25, 2021, 22:41
Default
  #4
RSM
New Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2021
Posts: 9
Rep Power: 5
RSM is on a distinguished road
but i was wondering, what do you mean about vacuum boundary condition, would you like to explain for me about this?
thank you for your reply
RSM is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   November 26, 2021, 08:50
Default
  #5
Member
 
Guvennergiz's Avatar
 
Guven Nergiz
Join Date: Jul 2020
Location: Turkey
Posts: 52
Rep Power: 6
Guvennergiz is on a distinguished road
I wanted to mean suction while saying vacuum. On this kind of seperation systems, fluid need to be suction from dusty area. Examples are below. Thats why there should be a mass flow outlet in the cyclones actually, not mass flow inlet.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pEVpF404Hu8

Sample.jpg
Guvennergiz is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   November 29, 2021, 23:01
Default
  #6
RSM
New Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2021
Posts: 9
Rep Power: 5
RSM is on a distinguished road
thank you for your reply
RSM is offline   Reply With Quote

Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Cyclone separation efficiency using CFX Benfa CFX 20 April 9, 2019 14:10
Separation efficiency in an straight through cyclone with water Cloudseeker Main CFD Forum 2 February 12, 2016 05:17
Cyclone separation efficiency & Particle Trajectories Mukhtiar Ali FLUENT 0 December 26, 2013 01:19
How can I find collection efficiency of cyclone by fluent? YuTsuYu FLUENT 1 July 2, 2013 16:46
Cyclone efficiency in DPM arjun3020 FLUENT 0 February 28, 2012 00:31


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 21:37.