|
[Sponsors] |
September 4, 2018, 09:34 |
Suspicious Harware Performance
|
#1 |
Member
Join Date: May 2012
Posts: 30
Rep Power: 14 |
Hi all,
I am working on simulation of forced convection from heated blocks in a channel. SST k-omega Intermittency Model is employed for tubulence modeling and numer of cells(hexa) is around 20M. The simulation is runing on eight E5-2650 v4(hyperthreading is disabled) processors and the system has 64Gb DDR4 2400Mhz quad channel memory. 1. The simulation has advanced only 0.55 seconds in two days. Up until now I have used Fluent with desktop computers for simpler simulations therefore I can't make performance comparsations with my old simulations. What I want to learn is whether this performance is normal or not? I am aware that advancement speed of simulation highly depend on problem but still I want to know opinion of experienced users. Because there is no way to compelete simulation at this speed. 2. There is another issue that make me suspicious about hardware. When I test same problem with 12, 24, 36, 48, ..... 96 cores, I see that 84 cores give best performance. Why it is not possible to get better performance with 96 cores? Last edited by CaptainCombo; September 4, 2018 at 10:09. Reason: Missing Information |
|
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Abysmal performance of 64 cores opteron based workstation for CFD | Fauster | Hardware | 8 | June 4, 2018 11:51 |
Openfoam parallel calculation performance study - Half performance on mpirun | Jurado | OpenFOAM Running, Solving & CFD | 22 | March 24, 2018 21:40 |
Performance hint for material libraries | chriss85 | OpenFOAM Programming & Development | 7 | September 17, 2014 05:41 |
parallel performance on BX900 | uzawa | OpenFOAM Installation | 3 | September 5, 2011 16:52 |
Linux kernel performance enhancement | ConnClark | OpenFOAM | 0 | January 17, 2011 19:18 |