|
[Sponsors] |
December 12, 2017, 17:54 |
Mesh to validat result of airfoil S1223
|
#1 |
New Member
José Mantovani
Join Date: Oct 2017
Location: Sao Paulo, Brazil, Earth.
Posts: 2
Rep Power: 0 |
Hello everyone!
The days I'm trying to get the experimental result for my numerical solution. Basically I'm doing an external flow simulation around an S1223 airfoil. I have tried several different meshes, all in vain, differently for NACA airfoils (which are relatively symmetrical) with a basic mesh converge the value of my solution with the experimental value. I would like some help or if anyone can give me some tips on how to improve my results. The experimental value of Cl for airfoil S1223 is, Cl = 2.23. But with my mesh the best I got was Cl = 1.09 (which sucks and does not suit me), yet the contours show expected physical results (low pressure on top and bottom on bottom, anyway ...), but the numerical result goes a long way. I believe the main problem is the mesh (and it is ...). Just to know, I'm using ANSYS software and its FLUENT solver. I'm doing everything by the Workbench, because that's where I know ... Sirs help me, I'm going crazy! LOL P.S.: I am using student package, a very refined mesh does not serve me, remembering the restriction of the package and my computer, so it can not be a prohibitive mesh. Thanks for attention and helping guys! |
|
December 13, 2017, 06:56 |
|
#2 |
New Member
José Mantovani
Join Date: Oct 2017
Location: Sao Paulo, Brazil, Earth.
Posts: 2
Rep Power: 0 |
Hello everyone!
The days I'm trying to get the experimental result for my numerical solution. Basically I'm doing an external flow simulation around an S1223 airfoil. I have tried several different meshes, all in vain, differently for NACA airfoils (which are relatively symmetrical) with a basic mesh converge the value of my solution with the experimental value. I would like some help or if anyone can give me some tips on how to improve my results. The experimental value of Cl for airfoil S1223 is, Cl = 2.23. But with my mesh the best I got was Cl = 1.09 (which sucks and does not suit me), yet the contours show expected physical results (low pressure on top and bottom on bottom, anyway ...), but the numerical result goes a long way. I believe the main problem is the mesh (and it is ...). Just to know, I'm using ANSYS software and its FLUENT solver. I'm doing everything by the Workbench, because that's where I know ... Sirs help me, I'm going crazy! LOL P.S.: I am using student package, a very refined mesh does not serve me, remembering the restriction of the package and my computer, so it can not be a prohibitive mesh. Thanks for attention and helping guys![/QUOTE] |
|
March 3, 2021, 16:39 |
|
#3 |
New Member
Aideal Zohary
Join Date: Feb 2019
Location: Malaysia
Posts: 28
Rep Power: 7 |
Hi, this is an old thread. But if anyone is still interested to run a simulation on the S1223 airfoil, please take a look at:
Numerical Investigation on the Pressure Drag of Some Low-Speed Airfoils for UAV Application. https://doi.org/10.37934/cfdl.13.2.2948 Unsteady 3-equation k omega intermittency SST was used. Good comparison with XFOIL and experimental data. Transition features also shown through cf and cp plots. |
|
September 2, 2021, 03:06 |
|
#4 | |
New Member
Aideal Zohary
Join Date: Feb 2019
Location: Malaysia
Posts: 28
Rep Power: 7 |
Quote:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qZRqBu9Ss2U |
||
Tags |
ansys, fluent, mesh |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
[mesh manipulation] Importing Multiple Meshes | thomasnwalshiii | OpenFOAM Meshing & Mesh Conversion | 18 | December 19, 2015 19:57 |
[ICEM] Hybrid Mesh on 2D airfoil | Jrmy | ANSYS Meshing & Geometry | 2 | August 14, 2014 16:08 |
[Other] 2D hex mesh on multi element airfoil | Verfblikje | OpenFOAM Meshing & Mesh Conversion | 0 | January 19, 2012 11:55 |
[snappyHexMesh] snappyHexMesh won't work - zeros everywhere! | sc298 | OpenFOAM Meshing & Mesh Conversion | 2 | March 27, 2011 22:11 |
How to control Minximum mesh space? | hung | FLUENT | 7 | April 18, 2005 10:38 |