|
[Sponsors] |
Difference in results with different "Processing options" (Core) |
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Search this Thread | Display Modes |
July 17, 2017, 14:34 |
Difference in results with different "Processing options" (Core)
|
#1 |
New Member
Ferdinand Allmendinger
Join Date: Jul 2017
Posts: 1
Rep Power: 0 |
Hey,
I have been searching the Net for a couple hours, but didn't find anything about this. So when I use Fluent with the totally same settings but different core settings (Serial/Parallel with 1, 2, 4, 6 or 8 Cores) I never get the same results. Sometimes the residuals converge, diverge or just stay constant. I'm not sure if this is a problem or which settings I should trust. If I use the same core settings the results are also nearly (95%) the same. I have an Core I7 with 4 cores and HT but it doesn't matter. This problem also occur on different PCs with different meshes (last pic with 12 cores). E.g. 1 Core (Serial) 2 Cores (Parallel) 4 Cores (Parallel) 8 Cores (Parallel) Again with 8 Cores (Parallel) 12 Cores (Parallel) Please I need help with this. Maybe someone had an explanation or a solution for this phenomenon... |
|
Tags |
core, parallel calculation, serial parallel multicore |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
mpirun, best parameters | pablodecastillo | Hardware | 18 | November 10, 2016 13:36 |
Different Results from Fluent 5.5 and Fluent 6.0 | Rajeev Kumar Singh | FLUENT | 6 | December 19, 2010 12:33 |
difference in results between 2D and 3D | Michelle | CFX | 3 | December 10, 2007 02:59 |
Difference results between Steady and Unsteady? | Giang T Vu | FLUENT | 6 | May 22, 2004 07:37 |
Difference in results using different Mesh? | Julie | FLUENT | 7 | July 2, 2002 11:28 |