|
[Sponsors] |
Extension with BEAM188 conflicts with other contacts |
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Search this Thread | Display Modes |
September 23, 2015, 07:03 |
Extension with BEAM188 conflicts with other contacts
|
#1 |
New Member
andrea
Join Date: Jun 2015
Posts: 2
Rep Power: 0 |
Hi all!
I am TOTALLY new to Ansys Mechanical APDL, so my question might sound quite basic, anyway, Iīm totally stacked right now and I havenīt found much information in the literature available. My simplified geometry (which intends to be applied in a bigger model)consists on a squared plate with a screw in the middle of it, where I apply a displacement. This plate represents a sandwich honeycomb panel, so it is composed of a middle core (solid), and two surfaces (top and bottom from it), all "sticked" with contacts. I am trying to simplify this geometry and I am currently trying to model the screw with a Beam188 element. My intention is that this is done automatically, so I am trying to develop an extension for that. As an initial point, I have introduced the coordinates where the Beam would be located manually. This is the input APDL part that I have written so far: *GET,n_el,ELEM,0,num,max *GET,mat1, ELEM,n_el,ATTR,MAT !Nodes n, 1, -0.1, 0.001, -0.1 n, 2, -0.1, 0.02, -0.1 n, 3, -0.2, 0.02, -0.1 propRadius=0.001 propK=0.5 l=0.01 !Beam type et,100,beam188 SECTYPE, 4, BEAM,CSOLID, 1, 0 SECOFFSET, CENT SECDATA, propRadius, 8, 2 KEYOPT, 100, 1, 0 KEYOPT, 100, 3, 2 KEYOPT, 100, 9, 0 !Material properties mp, ex, 16, 1592 mp, ey, 16, 1592 mp, ez, 16, 1592 mp, nuxy, 16, 0.3 !Element connection and orientation en, 100, 1, 2, 3 !Displacement boundary conditions d, 1, ux, 0 d, 1, uy, 0 d, 1, uz, 0 d, 1, rotx, 0 d, 1, roty, 0 d, 1, rotz, 0 !Applied force f, 2, fy, F eplot fini /solu When I solve in Ansys Mechanical, I obtaine the following error in the file.err: "The behavior of target elements specified by real constant 4 are not consistent. Some of elements belong to a rigid surface, while others belong to a deformable surface." Real constant 4 is referred to the contact between the core and bottom surface of the honeycomb panel. I havenīt been able to find any solution or any clear reason to know why this happens. As far as I have checked, Beam 188 is a flexible beam and the contacts between the surfaces have also been set as flexible. For sure I am missing something which is crucial in the model, but due to my lack of experience I am not able to solve it. If anyone could throw some light, I would be really thankful. Greetings, AnBil |
|
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
[OpenFOAM] Xlib: extension "GLX" missing on display | goldbeard | ParaView | 5 | March 24, 2013 14:12 |
errors when installing openfoam2.1 on ubuntu12.o4 | hewei | OpenFOAM Installation | 5 | May 29, 2012 08:43 |
Harmonic extension | lingdeer | Main CFD Forum | 0 | February 20, 2012 15:56 |
[OpenFOAM] Saving ParaFoam views and case | sail | ParaView | 9 | November 25, 2011 16:46 |
[OpenFOAM] Xwindows crash with paraview save | srinath | ParaView | 1 | October 15, 2008 10:37 |