|
[Sponsors] |
how valid are these assumptions to combustor modelling analysis? |
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Search this Thread | Display Modes |
April 3, 2015, 15:42 |
how valid are these assumptions to combustor modelling analysis?
|
#1 |
New Member
zack
Join Date: Oct 2014
Posts: 13
Rep Power: 12 |
Hey people!
We are modelling the flow in an annular combustion chamber for a miniature gas turbine. Being a 10 day (although rigorously studying) newbie to icem I have realised there are some assumptions i must make 1 spark plug is a continous heat souurce rather than time varying ALSO if not please suggest any alternative which can be steady state. Like how to model a spark plug. 2 It is technically multiphase flow because fuel entering is atomised But i want to assume both the incoming air and fuel vapor as gaseous and thus single phase. The motive then is to calculate velocity at exit. The time for this project is not much which is why these simplyfying assumptions i felt are needed. Please suggest any easier alternaties if you feel these assumptions are invalid. Any cool papers will be appreciated. |
|
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
[ANSYS Meshing] Plugin error no valid bodies found for 2d analysis in part Part | mrbrake | ANSYS Meshing & Geometry | 13 | October 27, 2021 12:44 |
[snappyHexMesh] How to define to right point for locationInMesh | Mirage12 | OpenFOAM Meshing & Mesh Conversion | 7 | March 13, 2016 15:07 |
[snappyHexMesh] determining displacement for added points | CFDnewbie147 | OpenFOAM Meshing & Mesh Conversion | 1 | October 22, 2013 10:53 |
The object "ADDITIONAL VARIABLE: alfa" is present in the object "/FLOW:Flow Analysis | l.te | CFX | 4 | October 9, 2012 14:56 |
OF 1.6 | Ubuntu 9.10 (64bit) | GLIBCXX_3.4.11 not found | piprus | OpenFOAM Installation | 22 | February 25, 2010 14:43 |