|
[Sponsors] |
CFX vs FLUENT for particle tracking simulation |
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Search this Thread | Display Modes |
August 28, 2012, 03:34 |
CFX vs FLUENT for particle tracking simulation
|
#1 |
New Member
iman
Join Date: Aug 2012
Location: malaysia
Posts: 10
Rep Power: 14 |
hi everybody
I'm going to do some simulation of water flow in pipeline with particle tracking i have done some searching and found that it is very common to use FLUENT or CFX (becide that, my university has a license for these software), however i cant decide which one i should use since I'm totally new to CFD software!! i would be grateful if you help me answer these particular questions: - for fluid field (and flow) simulation, is there any difference bt the two software? - for particle tracking can i use either one? which one is better? and why? - finally, if i need to move to another CFD software (e.g. from CFX to FLUENT) or integrate with MatLab i s it possible? thank you in advance iman |
|
August 29, 2012, 02:52 |
|
#2 |
Member
George Pichurov
Join Date: Jul 2010
Posts: 52
Rep Power: 16 |
Fluent can track particles, yes, and provides macros for integrating user-selected properties over the particle tracks. I have no experience as to what are the coding capabilities of CFX in this regard.
|
|
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
2D in Fluent Vs 2D in CFX | mohammad | FLUENT | 5 | January 6, 2012 11:30 |
Wall function formulation in CFX and Fluent | gravis | ANSYS | 0 | May 4, 2010 12:03 |
CFX steady simulation | gharek | CFX | 1 | April 7, 2010 19:41 |
FSI : CFX or Fluent? | icemaniac178 | ANSYS | 1 | February 19, 2010 07:33 |
Gradient Discretization CFX vs Fluent | Scott Nordsen | FLUENT | 1 | December 3, 2009 19:50 |