|
[Sponsors] |
April 23, 2012, 06:52 |
Industrial cyclone
|
#1 |
New Member
Join Date: Oct 2010
Posts: 20
Rep Power: 16 |
I modeled an industrial cyclone of 0.99 m radius and height around 11 m. The bottom part of the tangential velocity inlet gave skewness error while meshing in GAMBIT. For that I shifted the tangential inlet duct by 1 mm towards the cyclone axis to reduce the skewness. Now I'm, somehow, able to mesh (both surface and volume) and i've got around 1,60,000 tet cells (I'm still in trial phase). Is this shifting of the tangential inlet duct by 1 mm over 0.99 m radius justified? Moreover I'm unable to generate hex cells which, so far as I know, is better for my problem than tet cells!!! Suggestions will be appreciated !
|
|
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
[DPM problem] infinite particles loop in domain (twin cyclone - double cyclone)) | ghost82 | FLUENT | 6 | May 19, 2020 15:19 |
Steam-Water Vertical Cyclone Separator | Munggang | FLUENT | 3 | April 29, 2014 14:38 |
pulverized coal cyclone burner | Manuel Acosta | FLUENT | 9 | May 24, 2007 06:04 |
How to mesh the worm-inlet cyclone | Fuping Qian | FLUENT | 0 | July 7, 2005 04:59 |
Modelling Industrial cyclone behaviour | Günther Hasse | Main CFD Forum | 3 | October 12, 1999 20:34 |