CFD Online Logo CFD Online URL
www.cfd-online.com
[Sponsors]
Home > Forums > Software User Forums > ANSYS > ANSYS Meshing & Geometry

[ICEM] Surface mesh not sticking to surface

Register Blogs Community New Posts Updated Threads Search

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
Old   April 4, 2012, 07:14
Question Surface mesh not sticking to surface
  #1
New Member
 
Holt
Join Date: Nov 2011
Posts: 1
Rep Power: 0
holtwong is on a distinguished road
Hello,

I have been trying to make an unstructured tetra mesh (specifically of a turbine blade) with and without prisms.
I am finding that every time I generate the volume mesh, the surfaces which should be smoothly curved become very "bumpy" with ridges and individual bumps appearing which do not conform to the smooth geometry surface.

I was not aware of this happening until I used the mesh in FLUENT, which results in very spotty results due to the random ridges and bumps.
The most affected area is the external wall of the aerofoil which is a simple curved surface. There is no curvature in the spanwise direction, if you know what I mean.
The geometry has been fixed to a very small tolerance, a factor of 50 smaller than the elements in the problem area.
To make it fit the geometry again, I have to do a "project nodes to nearest surface" on all the surface nodes.
This is not such a big problem with a tetra mesh, but when I put in prisms on the surface, the bumps and ridges reappear, much larger, and this time some of the prisms which should be right on the surface actually end up inside the aerofoil. This means when I project the surface nodes to the surface, it turns some of the prisms inside out!

This seems really strange because I would have thought that when the volume mesh is created, it should stay faithful to the geometry unless otherwise specified, and when I grow prism layers in a tetra mesh, I would have thought it should keep the surface mesh (on the surface from which the prisms are growing) where it is rather than moving it about.
Can anyone help?
Attached are two images before and after prisms of one of the aerofoil surfaces
Attached Images
File Type: jpg screen_beforeprisms.jpg (31.6 KB, 59 views)
File Type: jpg screen_afterprisms.jpg (40.6 KB, 60 views)
holtwong is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   April 20, 2023, 07:00
Exclamation
  #2
New Member
 
Muskan
Join Date: Apr 2023
Posts: 1
Rep Power: 0
Muskan Ayubi is on a distinguished road
I am also dealing with the same issue but in my case there a gap in surface mesh as shown in following image please help me to solve it.
Attached Images
File Type: jpg IMG_20230420_152707.jpg (165.5 KB, 11 views)
Muskan Ayubi is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   April 20, 2023, 09:28
Default
  #3
Senior Member
 
Daniel
Join Date: Feb 2017
Location: Germany
Posts: 168
Rep Power: 9
zacko is on a distinguished road
Quote:
Originally Posted by Muskan Ayubi View Post
I am also dealing with the same issue but in my case there a gap in surface mesh as shown in following image please help me to solve it.
Here, you could try to increase your elements in circumferential direction.
You can increase the number of divisions when you add an element size method.
Just choose your circumferential line as geometrical selection.
zacko is offline   Reply With Quote

Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
how to set periodic boundary conditions Ganesh FLUENT 15 November 18, 2020 07:09
[snappyHexMesh] SnappyHexMesh for internal Flow vishwa OpenFOAM Meshing & Mesh Conversion 24 June 27, 2016 09:54
[Gmsh] Error : Self intersecting surface mesh, computing intersections & Error : Impossible velan OpenFOAM Meshing & Mesh Conversion 3 October 22, 2015 12:05
[snappyHexMesh] No layers in a small gap bobburnquist OpenFOAM Meshing & Mesh Conversion 6 August 26, 2015 10:38
virtual geometry richard FLUENT 4 January 7, 2009 06:16


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 22:58.