CFD Online Logo CFD Online URL
www.cfd-online.com
[Sponsors]
Home > Forums > Software User Forums > ANSYS > ANSYS Meshing & Geometry

[ANSYS Meshing] Icem cfd - applying different meshes to different domains

Register Blogs Community New Posts Updated Threads Search

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
Old   February 2, 2012, 14:49
Default Icem cfd - applying different meshes to different domains
  #1
Member
 
Vitaly
Join Date: Jan 2012
Posts: 32
Rep Power: 14
Vitaly is on a distinguished road
Hello,

I am trying to mesh a complex geometry with a single inlet and close to 200 outlets. Each outlet has an extension attached to it.
I am trying to get a tetrahedral mesh within the computational domain of interest and hexahedra for the outlet extensions, where the fluid dynamics is not important.
I have grouped the domain-of-interest and all the outlets into two separate parts.

I am new to ICEM CFD. Could someone please give me some guidance on how to do this? Best scenario would be if someone could recommend a good tutorial that does this type of meshing using ICEM.

Thanks a lot!

Vitaly
Vitaly is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   February 2, 2012, 19:01
Default A solution to the problem...
  #2
Member
 
Vitaly
Join Date: Jan 2012
Posts: 32
Rep Power: 14
Vitaly is on a distinguished road
I am posting this in case anyone needs it in the future.

Explaining how to produce different meshes in different parts of the domain would be too time consuming. The best thing to do would be to refer to the ICEM CFD 11 tutorial manual (http://mecanica.eafit.edu.co/~sorrego/icemtutorial.pdf).
Refer to the tutorial called: 4.6.2 Hybrid Tube (pg 448). This is a good example.

One problem is that I could not find the initial geometry files, therefore I had to create the geometry my self.
Vitaly is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   February 4, 2012, 16:14
Default
  #3
Senior Member
 
PSYMN's Avatar
 
Simon Pereira
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Ann Arbor, MI
Posts: 2,663
Blog Entries: 1
Rep Power: 47
PSYMN has a spectacular aura aboutPSYMN has a spectacular aura about
A common solution to this sort of problem where you are just trying to extend the outlets to prevent flow reversal is to just mesh the tetrahedral region and then just extrude the mesh on all the outlets... The triangular faces become extruded prisms and the transition is better than for a tetra/hexa merge...

If you look in the help, you can even see how to set an equation on the extrude so that the mesh will grow in aspect ratio down the tube...

This method is also much easier when you have a tetra/prism mesh at the outlets... the sides of the prisms will just extrude as hexas...
__________________
-----------------------------------------
Please help guide development at ANSYS by filling in these surveys

Public ANSYS ICEM CFD Users Survey

This second one is more general (Gambit, TGrid and ANSYS Meshing users welcome)...

CFD Online Users Survey
PSYMN is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   February 4, 2012, 17:54
Default
  #4
Member
 
Vitaly
Join Date: Jan 2012
Posts: 32
Rep Power: 14
Vitaly is on a distinguished road
Thanks a lot! I am just starting to play around with the extrusion process.
Vitaly is offline   Reply With Quote

Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
[ICEM] Icem CFD on Linux mechanicaldesign ANSYS Meshing & Geometry 7 March 11, 2021 20:44
Need help icem cfd kakhtar ANSYS Meshing & Geometry 25 January 31, 2017 02:09
Transport mesh from ICEM CFD, to Fluent, to Sysnoise Wieland FLUENT 2 April 15, 2012 07:28
Importing Solidworks part into ICEM CFD MetalSupremacist FLUENT 0 October 8, 2010 18:46
Which is better to develop in-house CFD code or to buy a available CFD package. Tareq Al-shaalan Main CFD Forum 10 June 13, 1999 00:27


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 17:21.