|
[Sponsors] |
January 26, 2012, 17:07 |
Elbow with internal formations
|
#1 |
New Member
Join Date: Apr 2011
Location: Athens, Greece
Posts: 3
Rep Power: 15 |
Hello,
I am trying to simulate water flow in an elbow with internal formations. In the corner of the elbow is attached a rod which is supported by 3 fins. I created the geometry with gambit 2.4.6. There are three main volumes, the two straight pipes (one empty inside and one with the internal formations) and the corner. I wanted to put Boundary Layer on the fin section so I started meshing from there and was ok. The problem is that the corner-volume (with the rod inside) can't be meshed using hex or hex wedge. The only way I could mesh it was using Hex core mesh with tet/hybrid elements ,which leads to a poor quality mesh and I can't use a boundary layer. Is there any way to mesh it with 'better' elements and BL? Maybe dividing the volumes somehow? Any suggestion would be helpfull. Thank you in advance |
|
January 27, 2012, 06:00 |
|
#2 |
Super Moderator
Maxime Perelli
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Switzerland
Posts: 3,297
Rep Power: 41 |
Your BL (in white) is not proper defined.
You don't need to attach a BL on internal surfaces, but on outer surfaces (wall) So in your case pipe-walls, on rod-walls Regarding tet-hexcore, you can surely fix your poor element. You can also spit your domain into 3: -the lower pipe without rod >> meshed with hexa -the upper pipe with rod >> meshed with hexa -the elbow part >> with tet-hexcore This should be quick meshed.
__________________
In memory of my friend Hervé: CFD engineer & freerider |
|
January 27, 2012, 18:37 |
|
#3 |
New Member
Join Date: Apr 2011
Location: Athens, Greece
Posts: 3
Rep Power: 15 |
Hello and thank you for your reply. I probably did not make clear that I am interested in checking the effect of the fins and the rod in the flow so in order to have these results I need a boundary layer on the fins which basically are faces without volume and are solved as shadow-walls in fluent. Also the domain is split in three volumes, as I said in my original post, but because of the geometry of the corner it's not possible to use tet/hex and cooper. If the rod was not united to the corner the cooper would work (I tried it). I would like some ideas about making a HEX mesh in the corner volume and also to be able to have BL in the fins-rod-pipe walls. A mesh with Hexcore and tet/hybrid without BL is what I have now.
Thank you again and I apologize for the length of my answer. |
|
January 30, 2012, 02:05 |
|
#4 | |
Super Moderator
Maxime Perelli
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Switzerland
Posts: 3,297
Rep Power: 41 |
ok then forget my BL point, but the other is still available.
Quote:
Could you please post a picture of the place where you cannot mesh it with tet-hexcore
__________________
In memory of my friend Hervé: CFD engineer & freerider |
||
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
[Commercial meshers] Internal boundary problem | stefanke | OpenFOAM Meshing & Mesh Conversion | 2 | May 24, 2011 03:21 |
[Commercial meshers] Fluent Mesh to OpenFoam: Internal Surface has to be a wall | sebastian | OpenFOAM Meshing & Mesh Conversion | 6 | October 21, 2010 05:36 |
Velocity profiles problem behind the elbow (3D problem) | kabat73 | FLUENT | 8 | May 9, 2010 05:26 |
Appropriate model for turbulent, steady state pipe elbow flow | milos | OpenFOAM Running, Solving & CFD | 4 | July 9, 2009 03:24 |
[Commercial meshers] TGridFluent mesh with internal by prism layer and internal face for diagnostic | sponiar | OpenFOAM Meshing & Mesh Conversion | 2 | March 30, 2009 16:02 |